Thanks, that was interesting! Red jacket guy often hits all the way from head to toe. It looks like he’s got shoulder - chest - hip - knee - foot cascades going that he doesn’t have to think about consciously. He’d be an excellent swordsman with little training.
This is the point I’ve been trying to make.
Two guys punching each other in a bar parking lot is not real combat by my definition. Neither one is going for the easy kill and maim shots, because it’s a social dominance ritual, a tournament - which is a very human, very meaningful event. Killing the opponent would completely defeat the purpose, it’d be an error.
From my perspective, going over a convenience store counter barehanded, grabbing a man with a loaded pistol and pounding his head against the concrete until brains come out is real combat. (The guy who did that knows nothing about BJJ or MMA, by the way, a good part of his ability comes from having no style at all, but mostly it comes from having no psychological limitations.)
If nobody gets killed or goes to jail, it almost certainly wasn’t real fighting. It was a tournament.
So I think BJJ is a great art, and would be happy to practice it. But just I would not characterize Chintokan Shorin-ryu as a circular style (I’d call it a linear style) I would not characterize the Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu I have seen as a combat style, I’d call it a tournament style, and a very good one. I mean no disrespect for the art itself when I disagree with the idea that it’s a combat style.
This illustrates why a tournament style can be a far better thing to learn than a combat style. Real combat is dehumanizing, a winning tournament style can be used to affirm life, not just to end it.
I’m sorry to have to tell you that I have heard that exact argument quite frequently. I am very much not kidding. But I’ve heard it about lots of other styles and arts, too, it seems to be a phase some people (usually young men) go through, where it’s important to them that their art is the bestest art…