Their differences are all on weird, abstract, nitpicky stuff like whether the economy should continue to benefit only the already wealthy or whether we should keep getting embroiled in more resource wars around the world.
I think you’ll need to be a bit more specific there, you’re not talking about any kind of actual policy at all there. Also the US isn’t involved in any wars for resources anywhere in the world, that’s an ignorant fantasy.
Here are actual policies they agree on in case you weren’t paying attention:
- Global Warming (though Clinton is better with her support of Nuclear Power, both oppose Keystone, differ in the other details but both have a range of measures which would probably do some good)
- Campaign Finance / Citizens United (virtually identical positions on all the key areas here)
- Minimum Wage ($12 vs. $15)
- Trade (both oppose TPP)
- Immigration (pretty much identical)
- Drug Reform (Bernie is better on this, but Clinton is mostly ok)
- Criminal Justice (some difference in the details, but broadly similar, both against private prisons)
The main areas of difference are Education, Finance (Glass-Steigal mostly), Health Care, Gun Control possibly (Sanders doesn’t have a good record there) but even in those most of Clinton’s policies are to the left of Obama’s, and most of Sanders’ are completely unworkable and would never get implemented anyway.
Edit: forgot to mention Foreign Policy, where Sanders is slightly less interventionist, but not by much. There are differences in their voting record, sure, but current actual stated policies aren’t that different.
Edit #2: reply should have been to @wysinwyg, something screwed up.
