no, the intent of the code was to make it superficially appear that a fully functional camera was bricked.
What is this âcyber crime lawâ ⌠is it different from âregular lawâ? Is it still under the âsupreme courtâ, or is there a new âcyber supreme courtâ?
Youâre off to cyber jail, buddy!
Cyber-cuffs? Can we use those for cyber-sex?
#CYBER #CYBER #CYBER
Thatâs⌠what?
[my brain just blue-screend]
That is a a cyberwoman. Sheâs wearing a cyberbikini, because she hasnât been fully cyberconverted.
Yeah, youâre going to get that.
featurenotabug
Cybermen have enough meat-parts left to be concerned with (partially) upgrading her underwear?
IN-teresting.
uh.
<thread-jack/>
We are migrating everyone to a single avatar style to eliminate confusion.
Just as I was about to comment on how confusing it is watching you and @OtherMichael converse. For a second I thought you were talking to yourself.
As for this prank? Meh.
You think itâs confusing? Iâve already got a warning from the luck dragon for something @OtherMichael was doing!
It wasnât me, it was @OtherMichel! Ce est mon histoire, et je suis coller Ă lui.
âYou canât complain about free stuffâ is such a lame justification for laziness or incompetence (or, in this case, malice.) Itâs like no oneâs ever heard of opportunity cost.
If I offer you a ride to the airport and throw you out with your luggage on the side of the freeway halfway there, does âHey, it was a free ride, you get what you pay for!â cut any ice?
Thatâs exactly why I use an alternative to rm that moves files to a location other than /dev/null (in my case ~/.Trash) for later deletion after Iâm sure I didnât throw away anything I didnât mean to. Of course you can still fuck things up that way, but not quite as badly.
Really? Not a community at all, then. Most videomakers are not coders and couldnât âcontributeâ even if they wanted. Or did you mean cash?
Of course, itâs sadly fitting for the experience of Canon users, since the company that stumbled into the âdslr video revolutionâ completely by accident has shown again and again it doesnât care about their video-centered customers unless theyâre paying top dollar for the âproâ line of products. And certainly didnât encourage or accept any of that âhacking to unlock potentialâ malarkey. So no one cares about anyone, hooray.
Panasonic had a much better response to people hacking their GH cameras: they paid attention to what people were looking for and why in the GH1 and GH2 hacks, and improved the newer models (GH3, GH4) to do pretty much the same things the hacks unlocked â but with factory reliability and no shenanigans necessary.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.