Pricier, more powerful Mac Mini reviewed

Is this the same thing that cory incorrectly posted a few days ago?

Update: After some doing, it’s possible to install GNU/Linux by disabling boot security altogether, though some further tweaking is required.

2 Likes

This is false. CF page 10 of Apple’s documentation of the t2 security chip explains how to disable it so that you can boot alternative OS’s.

Secure boot policy
This policy is only shown in Startup Security Utility on computers with the T2 chip.
The user is in control of the device’s settings, and may choose to disable or
downgrade the secure boot functionality.

3 Likes

Guess I missed the update, though originally this tool was not documented. Shame the choices don’t include secure boot with specified certificates though.

2 Likes

It’s particularly galling for long-time users who remember when practically everything in a Mac was upgradeable. I suppose Apple saw all the third-party stuff you could buy as lost revenue. It wouldn’t even be so bad if Apple’s upgrade charges weren’t so egregious. Now, of course, they’re trying to push the idea that everything will be upgraded by Thunderbolt cable. Which could work okay for some things, but not always.

2 Likes

Sometimes I feel like they want everything to fit their phone/tablet market. Where the item comes AS-IS and is essentially thrown out for a new model every few years.

That’s not what a computer is. They need to get their heads out of their collective asses.

1 Like

Apparently many people do think that’s what a computer is, and that’s why they sell so many. I’m sure they did the research and concluded that the number of users who want to upgrade things is far outweighed by the number of users who don’t care. But I guess it’s easy to criticize from the sidelines. Cory’s good at that too.

3 Likes

“long the black sheep of the Mac lineup”

How is the thing that Apple recomends as the functional replacement for the Xserve platform the “black sheep?” There exists high-density rack enclosures for these things, cases that incorporate Thunderbolt-attached storage as well as a place to put a Mini inside of them.

I get that they’re not the machine of choice for graphic design or whatever, but a thing that Apple directly promotes for use for use as server hardware is a far cry from a “black sheep.”

1 Like

Mac has a small market share compared to other desktop/laptop makers. And these numbers do not include sales for things like Chromebooks which I am willing to bet beat out Mac sales on their own as well.

Additionally this includes laptops and desktops…Macbooks are really no different then the vast majority of other laptops out there with the same “upgradeability” as the rest. It is specifically the desktop market where Apple is the only maker of non upgradeable systems…and only their brand loyalty had kept people coming back.

As for your asinine statement…I am not criticizing from the sidelines…my household has 5 iphones, 2 ipads, and 2 iMacs. I am one of their fucking customers and I get to fucking criticize them all I like.

3 Likes

You could at least use data that’s not almost two years old.


It’ll be interesting to see what the statistics are for CQ4, now that the new models are out.

And yes, you are criticizing from the sidelines. You want to make a difference? Go get a job there and make some changes. I see that this “lack of upgradability” hasn’t stopped you from purchasing, despite what you say, so maybe it’s not that big of a deal after all?

1 Like

A computer is not (or ought not to be) a disposable consumable - certainly not at Apple prices. The number of users who do not care increases as the opportunities to upgrade are closed down by Apple, as it never even occurs to many customers that upgrading is even a thing! Thus, Apple effectively trains its customers to treat computers as disposable consumables, and not even question it. My Macbook Pro is 6 years old and very upgradeable/repairable. My Macbook Air is 3 years old and has all the necessary sockets. Neither will be replaced by a newer one that does not have these qualities. I’ll go elsewhere next time. Hopefully that will be a long way off.

1 Like

The reason the Mac died back in 1984 is that users could not upgrade the thing. There were no open slots, no space inside and nothing to be done about it. PCs were so much better. It’s a pity, because it was a really innovative machine. Say thanks to Steve Jobs.

I’m sure they did, too. And that is exactly why folks who supported Apple during the lean years feel like Apple doesn’t care about them anymore.

1 Like

True, Jobs never liked upgrades. He disagreed with Woz on slots for the Apple II, and Woz won that fight (and a good thing, too).

1 Like

The soldered SSD is like a middle finger aimed right at its loyal users, but covered up by the other hand (ala Colbert). Why stop there, why not just weld the whole thing shut, assholes?

4 Likes

Big enough deal, that I just made the jump to Lenovo after being a Mac user since 1984. Mac hardware and macOS have been tanking in quality for years.

X.org with Keith Packard’s code actually wrings a lot of good out of Intel graphics chipsets. I haven’t bothered with additional graphics capability in linux machines, unless I had a salvaged nVidia card laying around, for quite some time.

1 Like

At this point I am going to wait and see what the new Mac Pro is like, if it ever actually appears. The past few years I’ve been shifting as much of my stuff as I can over to my laptop that runs Linux.

3 Likes

It seems like planned obsolescence. The SSD will fail after some number of writes, making the whole thing useless.

I have older laptop with Intel graphics chipset (Asus EEEpc). If I remember well, on Windows it supports only OpenGL 1.2, while open source drivers on Linux have OpenGL 2.0 support :slight_smile:

Probably other things will wear out first:

One of the Samsung SSD 850 PRO drives achieved a figure of 9.1 petabytes of data written! That’s 60 times the TBW figure Samsung promises on their data sheets. The other Samsung product – the Samsung SSD 750 Evo – was able to write 1.2 petabytes of data, which equals (in theory) to more than 80 years of constant writing. However, the pro models showed why their price is higher: None of them did write less than 2.2 Petabyte of data.

2 Likes

Myth. You have to write a staggering amount of data to an SSD in order to wear it out before the rest of the computer wears out. For the kind of use that an ordinary user would put on the drive, it will outlive its owner. Even the most extreme power user is going to be hard pressed to work the drive to the point that it fails before the computer belongs in a museum.

Assuming 3,000 write cycles and a write multiplication factor of 2.5, if you write 10 gb per day, every single day to the entry level mac mini’s 128gb ssd, it will wear out in 42 years, or 84 years for the 256 gb option.

3000 write cycles x 128gb / 2.5 x 3650gb writes per year = 42 years.

https://www.compuram.de/blog/en/the-life-span-of-a-ssd-how-long-does-it-last-and-what-can-be-done-to-take-care/

2 Likes