I can make posts by substituting words in other people’s posts.
If you didn’t vote for Jill Stein you are either a racist anti-semitic misogynist, or a person who enables racist anti-semitic misogynists.
People who voted against breathable air - a voter group which includes all Trump voters, all Johnson voters, and all Clinton voters - really need to get their priorities straight, and start voting for their species instead of voting against Jewish women.
Yet voting for the least worst candidate is what we call “participating in Democracy”. I don’t think I’ve done anything else ever, from mayors to POTUS, all candidates have warts. After you do everything you’re willing to do to keep your preferred candidate in the race, if they’re not on the ballot you vote for the least bad, preferably one that can actually win. This is why I support ranked voting, it makes no difference whether you rank them in “best to least best” or “least bad to worst”, the effect is the same. Had Trump, Clinton, Sanders, Stein et al been on a ranked voting ballot, Clinton would have won.
Trump voters didn’t vote against breathable air, they just want to monetize breathable air.
What good is a bunch of free, breathable air doing, just floating around?
Yes I did. I pointed out that Clinton won the popular vote by three million votes. So you’re saying, “it’s Clinton’s fault she won the popular vote,” which should have given you pause in your claims from the get go. I also pointed out the problems with you claiming your ideas in any way represent, “the will of the people.” So no, you’re just refusing to listen to or think about anything being said to counter your viewpoints while at the same time getting more and more belligerent, which means there’s no further point in trying to talk to you.
It’s Clinton’s fault she didn’t win the Electoral College, which is the system we have and the system she should have been working to win. The popular vote is is ‘feels’, but meaningless in this case where the Electoral votes are the ‘reals’.
As you just made a point about ‘working with what one has’, it’s pretty disingenuous to try and flip it to fit the narrative you’re pushing.
you’re just refusing to listen to or think about anything being said to counter your viewpoints while at the same time getting more and more belligerent, which means there’s no further point in trying to talk to you.
I get it. Can’t address any points, so this is your ‘graceful’ exit. Great being talked at by you.
That would require a primary process, which, I’m told, confuses our feckless voters and damages our Dear Leader so much that he or she can’t possibly win in the general election.
If there are to be any primary candidates other than our Dear Leader, we must avert our eyes. They exist only to test our loyalty. WE WILL NOT FAIL YOU DEAR LEADER.
This circular firing squad will automatically close in a day.
If only it wasn’t facing outward
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.