At least the blog in the VIA had the decency to disguise the link to youtube.
1 Like
Is there anyway to filter some of the site’s writers?
Cory,David & Mark’s post’s are the only one’s worth reading anymore.
2 Likes
I’d suggest to write a greasemonkey/tampermonkey script.
2 Likes
DAMMIT WHY DID I HAVE TO READ THE COMMENTS BEFORE I CLICKED THE LINK? THE JOKE IS RUINED! RUINED I TELL YOU!
15 Likes
The funny thing is that as a sociology graduate from the late 1990s, I’d have no problem confecting a critique of rickrolling from a critical/queer theory background. But none other than Judith Butler already did it, more or less, in “Performativity and the Pleasure Principle.” By her standards it’s a short read, worth a look.
20 Likes
]
12 Likes
You don’t have Adblock yet?!
5 Likes
13 Likes
can we settle this - garlic bread stick, or really big dooby?
2 Likes
I’m just going to assume the link is a rickroll and move on with my life.
4 Likes
Are you expressing disappointment with BB?
[edit] Dang, no dice.
2 Likes
Oh, I hope so!
4 Likes
Hmmm… Maybe just a preference?
I’m quite sure there are those who like this kinda of post. Just not my cup of Kopi Luwak .
The funny thing is that as a pro writer, I’d have no problem confecting an ethnomusicological academic paper on the debased discourse of rickrolling, mired as it is in the everpresent fear that you will once again be linked to the video. But it’s already been done: “Explaining away the humor: Rickrolling 5 years out.” By the standards of modern blogging it’s a short read, worth a look.
5 Likes
now i love you
snort And it’s not even April First!
1 Like
You should’ve used a link shortener.
1 Like
3 Likes
6 Likes
