Student ejected from ceremony for graduating while black

boing
275

I’m taking great care with my wording, so please, if something I say causes a knee-jerk reaction, please ask me - in your own words, what you thought I meant & give me a chance to clarify. Don’t forget that good written communication skills aren’t a privilege we all enjoy, but after reading this thread I feel like there is an angle that perhaps needs discussion/examination. Or not. I have been known to make mistakes, from time to time. If I’m well off the mark - plz just disregard this post.

It’s been my experience when visiting schools (I’m decades past this event but sometimes work InfoSec with schools) is that “Zero Tolerance Policies” have run amok. Recall that ZTP were instilled because school admins “couldn’t be trusted” to make case/case decisions & in the name of achieving the exact same result for a variety of transgressions - in the name of equality - which in many cases, that was truly needed.

Fast forward to now and ZTP is micro-managing admin to student interactions. It is quite possible that there is a ZTP in place for “any disruption” during graduation that results in the offending student being ejected. It’s also possible that any deviation from established dress code instantly equates to a “disruption”, and per ZTP the local admin has zero discretion in determining what is or is not a disruption, but that anything that deviates one iota from absolute conformity == disruption that must be stamped our per the school boards ZTP.

Along this train of thought then, it is equally possible that ZTP exist that forbid the administration from interacting with the student body for disciplinary actions and, that being the reason LEO’s were there - per ZTP, that it must be a LEO that interacts with a “disruptive student”.

The admins could well be horrified by, and powerless to change, this result. In my heart of hearts tho, I think this but one cog in this particular machine… anyway.

With the above said, I would think that any admin stepping in to defend this child’s actions would be admirable- but with the way the job market is & how hard it could be to get another school job after being fired for going against both policy & LEO’s… I dunno.

I do see that there is a MASSIVE problem here, but I fear race sometimes distracts us from the underlying systemic issues that not only allow such a travesty to take place but go even further and encourage LEO’s to act as jackbooted thugs where our - OUR - children are concerned.

2 Likes
276

What boggles my mind is if this happened in the private sector, the person at worst would be sent home by hr or their manager. But realistically nothing would happen, since it isn’t actually a distraction.

But I still stand behind Dance Off.

5 Likes
277

I’m glad we were able to deescalate our antagonism and have a real discussion. Sometimes anger is like a living thing between people that takes both of them over if they let it. I’m glad we ultimately didn’t.

I also went to a private high school. Growing up I was home-schooled between grades 4 and 9. This was my choice. My sister went to public school and had, on the balance, a positive experience. I chose to take my parents up on the offer for homeschooling. There’s this misconception about homeschooling that it’s just your parents being your teachers. One reason it was open to me was because my parents, who were only mildly religious, were part of an interfaith homeschooling community. But by the time I was in 10th grade, I wanted to have the experience of a big high school. Problem was, I tested into the 10th grade, but the school district where my dad was stationed would only let me enter at the 8th grade because of my young age. So I explored my options. I found a tuition-free boys boarding school that accepted students who qualified based on a combined evaluation of grades, exams, an essay and an interview. I was accepted at the 10th grade, though I lived in the dorm with the 9th graders the first semester to see how I acclimated. One of the best times of my life.

I brought all that up because we too had a dress code. And chapel every morning at 6:30 AM. Like your school, we had boys from all over the world. The reverend not only made sure every student was allowed to express their ethnicity, he even worked with the students to set up services for their own faiths. At chapel boys were expected to wear their dress code, but also encouraged to wear their ethnic dress over their shirt and tie, as long as they cleared it with him first. Though I was already agnostic at the time, the Rev was a role model to me on how to find common ground and respect people who come from different backgrounds, and I, even now as an atheist, look back on his chapel services with both pride and affection.

12 Likes
278

Sure, but they should also recognize their responsibility for learning about their own likely racist tendencies, and about how such tendencies can lead them to treat students who are not white badly.

Btw, saying so is not a way of “making lazy accusations over the internet.” It’s instead a way of highlighting, as the incident in question does, a common form of racism. Many studies show that in such cases, calling in LEOs and otherwise overreacting is far more common when the student is black.

And you know what else is also common when such situations get highlighted and discussed as probable instances of racism? White folks marching in and claiming that the real issue we should all be talking about instead is how tough it is to be a teacher. I admire teachers at all levels and agree that their jobs can be very difficult, but that’s just not the issue here.

2 Likes
279

What does this have to do with teachers? Zero Tolerance Policies are the requirements of lazy administrations.

2 Likes
280

Let him graduate. If someone has a problem with my decision, I can handle the weight more than a student.

And then … dance off.

10 Likes
281

Just name-calling, you mean to say.

282

Take it to the bridge, maceo.

5 Likes
283

However, teachers have the luxury of exercising discretion and recognizing when a student rightfully points out a rule is wrong, and blindly following it is wrong, and insisting everyone follow it is wrong. If you can’t do that, you shouldn’t be teaching.

6 Likes
284

3 Likes
285

Now I’m sorry I posted this. It BURNS!!!

6 Likes
286

4 Likes
287

Seriously? And, if you are Hawaiian, you should be allowed to wear that hula skirt. Unless it is a school award, it is inappropriate.

1 Like
288

If you cannot adhere to an institutions policies, you are an anarchist or a baby. Y’all preach anarchy, ya’ know?

289
15 Likes
290

[quote=“milliefink, post:278, topic:78756”]
Sure, but they should also recognize their responsibility for learning about their own likely racist tendencies, and about how such tendencies can lead them to treat students who are not white badly.[/quote]
This is a person who chose to teach in a progressive white-minority mixed-race school, I think it is rather presumptive and arrogant to assume that you’ve done more reflection on matters of race than they have.

[quote=“milliefink, post:278, topic:78756”]
Btw, saying so is not a way of “making lazy accusations over the internet.” It’s instead a way of highlighting, as the incident in question does, a common form of racism.[/quote]
This thread continues to be saturated with epistemic commitment.

[quote=“M_Dub, post:283, topic:78756”]
However, teachers have the luxury of exercising discretion and recognizing when a student rightfully points out a rule is wrong[/quote]
Whatever makes you believe that? In fact, teachers are second-guessed on their decisions all the time. You’re doing it now.

The school district is now re-evaluating their commencement policy, which is a good thing. The zero-tolerance policy on adornment is probably something inherited from inner-city schools, where they are worried about gang symbols (and where the cops would have already been standing by), but this probably doesn’t make sense in this middle-class suburb. The student’s political statement has had its desired effect.

As much as I loathe the fact that I’m in agreement on this issue with posters who do not believe in the existence of structural racism, even a stopped clock is right twice a day. The accusations that have been made are completely overblown.

2 Likes
291

On that point, you and I are in total agreement. Calling the police to kick a student out of his graduation because he’s wearing a kente cloth is a grossly inappropriate, unjustifiable overreaction, and the teachers/officials responsible should be second-guessed right out of the jobs they are clearly unqualified to have.

4 Likes
292

6 Likes
293

I would have gone with a semicolon, if only to make intentional misparsing more difficult.

2 Likes
294

5 Likes