Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2018/09/24/supersonic-a-glorious-new-art.html
β¦
The air museum in Seattle has one. I was surprised at how small the interior space is.
Itβs pretty shocking to be sure. Definitely not the kind of luxury I would have expected from such an expensive flight. Very narrow and cramped seats.
All things Concorde, weird.
Sorry to be picky, but itβs βConcordeβ, not βthe Concordeβ. The designers made a big deal of that distinction.
Tell it to the model of the Concorde I made out of legos.
The photoβs not mine, but I grew up with one of these mixed in the cupboard with our Corelle and Burger King collectibles
I remember hearing Rush Limbaugh chiming in just after the crash of Air France Flight 4590 in 2000 (though for the life of me I canβt for the life of me remember why I was listening to his show). His takeaway from the tragedy was βyeah, I flew on the Concorde once and itβs not really as luxurious as people make it out to be.β
Thanks, I just went on a huge dive down a rabbithole about the crash of 4590 in Paris.
The tangible luxury was time saved. Concorde was aimed at people who charge very large amounts of money per hour and who werenβt making it stuck on a 707 as it toiled for seven hours over the Atlantic.
The intangible luxury was that you could cough up Β£5k for a ticket (a number plucked out of thin air by BOAC) which put you in a different league to regular first class travellers.
Concorde was the last gasp of true glamour in aviation. It was also impossibly beautiful and why have I just ordered this book?
For your daily dose of the Concorde stuff.
A better title could have been Supersonique: The Concorde Years (1976-2003)
Or just, you knowβ¦ Concorde: Complete βBβ Sides.
That silverware set looked like the sort of design that so preciously valued appearance of use that I dislike it. That spoon looks borderline unusable. That bottleopener though, I LOVE it.
The aircraft is a thing of beauty. Itβs interior is a thing of claustrophobia, even just walking through it.
I was on hand the day The Museum of Flight at Boeing Field received its Concorde. The aircraft is apparently heavier than it appears; the first tug they brought in to pull it close to the museum had too light a towbar, which broke under the weight of the plane. It took a good 45 minutes, as I remember, to get a new towbar and pull the poor aircraft into place. It was winter, everyone was cold, and no one really cared.
https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/423988-concorde-question.html
A magical beast.
That bottleopener deserve a fanclub by itself.
Which reminds me, I really need to find some post-millennials to talk to about technological progress:
βWhen I was a kid, technology was primitive. Reinstalling an operating system on my Mac took over 5 minutes, the worldβs biggest spaceships could only take at most 7 people at a time to orbit and back, and the worldβs fastest passenger plane took almost three hours to get from London to New York.β
Brainspore and MikeR make good points in reply, but also β¦ people were on average thinner back then, I suspect.
And I love that Concorde-shaped bottle opener. Want!
Thereβs one selling on eBay right now. Iβd buy it but I already have a drawer full of bottle openers that I donβt use.