Ted Cruz is / is not eligible to be president - legal scholars duke it out

My definition relies on disclosing whether his birth was vaginal or Caesarian.

8 Likes

No Canadian of woman born shall out Sen McBeth (R Helsingor)

7 Likes

Clinton and Obama jointly sponsored the resolution for McCain. I’m sure they’d be overjoyed to do the same for Cruz. Only Trump and Carson make Cruz look like a viable candidate by comparison, and that’s not saying much.

Heck, if Trump keeps questioning Cruz’s eligibility, I’ll bet that Clinton will publicly lead Democrats to sponsor just such a resolution whether Cruz wants it or not. Just to watch Republicans vote against it.

5 Likes

My thoughts are as follows: Was the person elected in a free and fair election? They can be president. If it says otherwise, the Constitution is wrong. Period. The only restriction should be that they cannot also work or be head of state/royalty for another nation in any capacity. It’s a democracy, we’ll decide if they’re eligible.

6 Likes

There is a school of thought that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment nullified the “natural born” part when it took effect in 1868. But the only way to definitively answer that question would be to argue the case all the way up to the Supreme Court, and that’s a daunting proposition for a major political party because nobody wants to throw all their weight behind a candidate who might not be legally eligible for the job.

2 Likes

I’m certain that enough constitutional lawyers on Cruz’ payroll will sort through the confusion and make it undeniably legal very soon, but regardless of the technicalities, I’ll be very curious to see if the fact that Cruz was born in Canada and held Canadian citizenship up until 2013 will affect his standing in the polls as the campaign rolls along. For a hard-core Tea Partier to be associated with the Commie Socialist North (land of European-style free health care! They speak French!!) would make his followers blanch in horror, I’d think.

1 Like

So, by the first definition, he’s also a natural-born Cuban and also a natural-born Canadian. Should a natural-born Cuban be eligible to be the president of the United States? And it was only 20 months ago that he was a Canadian citizen.

I’m with @daneel – unsure if eligible, but not fit.

4 Likes

I’m sure they would blanch in horror if they didn’t like Cruz. But if they like him then they’ll just admire him for seeing the light even though that Canadian Commie fog. It’s not like the people who support Cruz are going to be long on consistency.

8 Likes

[quote=“ActionAbe, post:25, topic:72011, full:true”]
My thoughts are as follows: Was the person elected in a free and fair election? They can be president. If it says otherwise, the Constitution is wrong.[/quote]

Limiting the Presidency to natural-born citizens is a measure against another country from coming in and setting up a puppet government. Or at the very least, to ensure that the President’s first loyalty is to America.

It seems fair to raise this point regarding someone who only just dropped his foreign citizenship in 2014 as he started his Presidential election campaign.

5 Likes

Out of curiosity just looked up the order of Presidential succession. Treasury is 5th and Homeland Security 16th. Go figure. Interesting that a Speaker has never ascended, there’s been cumulatively a number of years that there was no VP at all.

The whole debate is idiotic as there shouldn’t be any legal restriction on holding presidential office other than citizenship. If enough people want to vote in somebody who immigrated, they should have the legal right to do so.

The oil’s not in Calgary anyway, so it would be a waste of time.

Speaking as a Canadian, you can have him. Even if he can’t be president, we don’t really want him back.

Our head of state (Governor General) a few years ago was a Haitian born dual French & Canadian citizen. Somehow we survived, though the more recent Conservative government felt compelled to quickly install a couple of the underrepresented white Christian male demographic.

3 Likes

Doesn’t this cut both ways? I seem to remember something about Boris Johnson having to renounce his US citizenship if he wanted to be Prime Minister - something about Americans not being allowed to be the head of government of a different country?

(although I think Johnson was really trying to avoid big tax bills, and I have half a suspicion he only talked about doing it, and didn’t actually go through with it).

Don’t worry… close enough. We don’t do that much research when we invade a country.

3 Likes

The answer to this would surely depend on whether the majority in the U.S. Supreme Court took an originalist or a more nuanced view of constitutional interpretation. Ironically Cruz and his party support what they believe is an original framers’ thoughts that they magically know is the truth forever.

So: if Cruz wins and becomes president and stuffs the court with fuckwits who believe that U.S. Law should be decided to mean what a bunch of slave owners thought was a good idea centuries ago: no. If rationality wins, and progressive voices are a majority in the court: yes.

Which is kind of funny for foreigners.

2 Likes

Boris Johnson leading a country (shudders) it would be like if Cameron had brains.

2 Likes

No it’s not. Another country cannot simply install a president with the ease and grace you imply. We can still impeach and convict a president of high crimes and misdemeanors, so it’s not like we’re going to suddenly be helpless in the event we have a president that acts against American interest. There are other countries that don’t have this requirement, and I have yet to hear of this paranoid hypothetical happening.

Also, I knew a guy who was born in the US, had US citizenship, and spent his whole life in Jordan with his Jordanian family. Are you telling me that when he comes back and spends fourteen years as a resident, he should be more eligible for the presidency than Ted Cruz? Gimme a break.

2 Likes

We should probably deal with the “enough people” part first and have popular election of the president first, but I agree I think.

That’s not how puppet governments work. You get yourself a loyal traitor posing as a patriot doing the best for his or her country that really loves them the country. A true patriot quisling traitor.

Have a quick look at the puppet governments of the countries invaded by the U.S. They tend to be ruled by traitors from those countries don’t they? Everyone did it that way. Romans, whoever.

4 Likes