Originally published at: The ROT8000 cipher, for when ROT13 just isn't enough letters | Boing Boing
…
4 Likes
This is great, but they’ve really missed an opportunity to go over 9000 here.
4 Likes
I wonder if there are downsides hiding in unicode/emoji features like combining characters and punycode that may “break” output or otherwise confound the copy/paste behavior needed for the return trip.
That’s a good question; for instance, are nonbreakable spaces …breakable? But emoji-land is avoided as emojis go from U+10000 to U+1FFFF, and this rotates chars U+0 through U+FFFF; given the U+8000 middle point (“We meet at midnight” ain’t gonna end up: 
)
1 Like
rot26 is what I use; twice as secure as rot13!
12 Likes
Alas, I suppose rotBEEF just isn’t feasible.
1 Like
I rot13 twice for extra security.
3 Likes
They would have been better off using the emoji codepage here.
That being said, nothing beats 4 pass rot13 for the ultimate in encryption.
1 Like
The screenshot intrigued me - looks like kanji right there. So why not test this…:
Then let’s hit up Google Translate…
Well. That was interesting 
2 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
