The UK Gold: riveting documentary on the deep, ingrained corruption of the UK's banking centre, the City of London

Ameliorate? How? I agree, it’s true that the government is the largest criminal organization in the UK - I’m simply confused as to why someone would single out a local council for documentary treatment. More to the point, I’m absolutely sure that everything they are doing is quite legal under the law, regardless of how it may be viewed by others. The trailer attempts to imply that what is going on is somehow a secret, somehow hidden from the government, which is quite obviously not the case - the people doing this are the government.

I called them criminal and attempting to hide the inbuilt arbitrage of tax avoidance, constantly written in to law by corrupt and criminal conspirators (I said it!) behind the formal frontispiece of a local council is verging on lunacy. Are you aware of the just world fallacy?


They probably were referring not to an MP but rather the Remembrancer. According to the City’s website:

The Office [of Remembrancer] acts as a channel of communication between Parliament and the City. In the contemporary context, this means day to day examination of Parliamentary business including examination of and briefing on proposed legislation and amendments to it, regular liaison with the Select Committees of both Houses and contact with officials in Government departments dealing with Parliamentary Bills. Liaison is also maintained with the City Office in Brussels and other Member States’ permanent representations in relation to draft EU legislation.

Over the last millennium the City has accumulated other special privileges like being allowed to set its own business rate “at a higher or lower level than the National Non-Domestic Rate determined by central government for the rest of the country,” and allowing businesses to vote.


I like the production company’s name - but where’s their self re-cocking-spect?


1 Like

To be a bit pedantic about it, in this case it was more due to the nature of Gary Clail’s role in the whole thing being first in live events to warm up crowds and as part of recordings later and keeping him separate from any other On-U recordings. The riddim used here was released as “JA Minor” on Strike The Balance by the Dub Syndicate collective,

1 Like

Looks fascinating. I hope I can watch it sometime without buying it.

I am starting to think that the financial gangsterism is in its end stages. They are out in the open now, and think they are untouchable. Which they will be until they really break something, at which point the tumbrels will roll (at least figuratively).

1 Like

The UK Gold is not a “riveting documentary”, but merely conspiracy theorist drivel. Mark Donne is not a journalist, but merely an amateur film maker who has contributed a small number of ‘opinion pieces’ (space fillers) to newspapers. With no journalistic experience and no grasp of basic research methods he got taken in by various nutters with their loony assertions about the City of London Corporation.

Far from secretive, agendas and minutes for all the Corporation’s myriad committees are available online. Committees are held in public in the same manner as any other English local government body.

The Corporation does not have an office at the Palace of Westminster nor does it have a budget of $1.2 billion, nor anything like it. Residents and businesses in the City are subject to the same laws and pay the same taxes as anywhere else in England.

Cayman Islands

As for the Cayman Islands (mentioned in the trailer and a matter Donne has prattled on about elsewhere) the premier lost his majority in Parliament when two or three of his members crossed the floor and joined the opposition; giving the then opposition leader sufficient members to form a new government.

All proposed legislation (or Bills as they are better known) are available on the Parliament website for anybody, anywhere in the world to view for free.
Up until the 1980s all principal councils in England and Wales set their own business rate. It is an Urban Myth that businesses can vote. See my comment on a previous doctorow post:

The City is represented in Parliament in the normal way by the member for the Cities of London and Westminster. The City Remembrancer no more ‘sits’ in Parliament than a hack in the press gallery or a Japanese tourist in the press gallery does.


nor does it have a budget of $1.2 billion, nor anything like it.

Well, there is the City’s Cash, which is “not governed by any statutes or regulations and there is no statutory requirement to publish the City’s Cash annual report and financial statements.” The non-required annual report goes on to state that as of March 2013 it had net assets worth ₤1.8 billion. Of course, that’s not the same thing as an operating budget. If I’m reading the summary budget right the City this year has about ₤550 in revenue and ₤555 million in expenses.

All proposed legislation (or Bills as they are better known) are available on the Parliament website for anybody, anywhere in the world to view for free.

Yes, anyone can read the Hansard and other business online. I suspect not everyone gets to regularly meet face-to-face with Select Committees and department officials, which is explicitly described as a duty of the Remembrancer on page 76 of the above-mentioned summary budget. In my general experience direct, personal contact with legislators is something valuable enough for people to spend large sums of money to get.

Up until the 1980s all principal councils in England and Wales set their own business rate.

And now they don’t, except for the City. The City’s own website describes their current situation as “unique”.

It is an Urban Myth that businesses can vote. See my comment on a previous doctorow post:

Would that be the post where you say “15,581 [voters] are either appointees of businesses (or institutions such as churches, charities and educational establishments) or they are sole traders or members of partnerships.”? Because that sounds quite a bit like businesses voting. I will cop to technical imprecision in that businesses don’t directly vote but instead nominate employees to do so.


The reason why the City Cash is “not governed by any statutes…” is that it is not public money. In reality it is not money, but land and buildings, many of which are operational. Not sure which page you got the £550/555million from, going by page ix I make it about £500 million, but no matter. Whatever the grand total the majority of income and expenditure (£336 million) is City Fund i.e. ordinary local council expenditure.

If you regularly attend any select committee the Chairman will want to know who you are. Although open to the public most select committee hearings are thinly attended.

As I went on to say in the previous comment “All voting is by secret ballot in the normal way.” so businesses can choose who they appoint, but cannot control how they vote.

It’s no use arguing with the inequality deniers.

1 Like

The bankers must have put up the libertarian lapdog Bat Signal.

Won’t somebody think of the poor bankers who are constantly manipulated by governments…?

You might recall that the “libertarian lapdogs”, as you call them, argued that the bankers should be left to go bankrupt. It was the “progressive lickspittles” who argued for bailing them out and saving them. Progessives are the reason these people are still rich and powerful.

And this case is precisely how the argument goes. “Look at the evil corporations!” Oh wait, that’s actually a government. Pay no attention to the men behind the curtain, just put your blind faith in your betters.

No one here is denying inequality, that I can see. We’re just pointing out that it is the UK government creating inequality, not the “evil corporations”. And contrary to the theme of the documentary, it’s being done quite out in the open.

Progressives argued for making them bail themselves out with private money, seizing and nationalizing them, or dismantling them as well as investigations and prison time.

Libertarians of course would make everyday people pay for the malfeasance of a tiny out of control elite, which is why you are PRECISELY their lapdogs. We all know that when elite businesses go bankrupt that the elites don’t really suffer for it. When economies collapse* or go into deep recession everyone pays, except of course that tiny elite that you all dutifully defend. Again, lapdogs.

*uh sorry: “market corrections”…

Yet none of that happened, despite the Progressives being in charge of the U.S. government at the time. In fact, what did happen? Oh right, tens of billions of dollars in public money was taken and given to the elites to bail them out - and the handout continues today, with quantitative easing. How many went to jail? How many got nationalized? Zero. Progressives are always the ones telling us to trust the government, to trust the experts - but the government and the experts were the ones cried “economic collapse” with no evidence and who bailed out the elites and protected them, and continue to do. So who is the lapdog here?

Well, I’d argue ‘progressive’ is a meaningless term to apply to the people who did that. Lickspittles I’m fine with.

I’d also argue that libertarians, by and large, can go piss up a rope, mind.

Are you from an alternate timeline? When was the last time Progressives have been in charge of the US government? Have they ever been?

1 Like


Alright, we’re done. With the exception of perhaps Bernie Sanders and almost a couple other Congress-critters there’s not a single “progressive” in D.C. Also, the bailouts (TARP) began and were signed into law under George Bush… All the people involved in crafting the bailouts are neoliberal ideologues and ex (soon to be again) bankers.

So who is the lapdog here?

That’s still you.

This is how a bank crisis is handled in countries where the government isn’t overrun by wealthy elites, and neoliberal and libertarian think tanks and money:,8599,1843659,00.html

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.