Originally published at: This is the best book of the past 125 years, according to New York Times Book Review readers | Boing Boing
…
Fun to see the crossover between this and the most hated lists. (Tolkien and Faulkner for example)
It is almost like the quality of a book is a matter of opinion and up to individual taste.
I guess they’ve never read O Lost or Gravity’s Rainbow. sheesh
125 years. . .
Which means Moby Dick (publ. 1851) was “grandfathered out.”
So we don’t have to do the whole Moby-Dick-good-or-bad argument.
(phew)
Not Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health?
Ha Ha Ha Ha!
The Fellowships of the Rings is a masterpiece of fictional world-building and creative linguistics, but as a novel it’s mediocre.
/runs and hides
Interesting slice between critical and popular taste.
or HUCK FINN.
That’s what happens when every 6th-grade teacher in the country assigns the same book as required reading.
Exactly.
TKAM is a piece of classist, outdated white-savior crap. Same for the movie (the popularity of which probably also bolsters that of the book).
1984 is a great fiction novel to read, but I wouldn’t put in the top 5.
I guess Scientology has dwindled to the point that they can no longer rig book polls. How sad!
The sequel is even worse with the racism.
Yeah, so I’ve heard. TKAM itself left me with no desire to read that posthumous sequel (that I guess is actually a prequel? Not that I actually care, etc.).
Atticus comes out as a complete asshole and it paints the first book even worse than it already was. It is a horrible mashup of boisterous, forward feminine attitudes (Scout is so avant garde with her short hair…) and “they must be guided!” racism. You are not missing out.
It was an early rough draft of the other book
And there’s a very good reason it was never released while Lee was alive: it just isn’t any good.
.
Well… they’re no “Clitsy Weldon”… but these are all quite good.
.