Agreed!!! Really hard to vote out some of these clowns due to the gerrymandering they have done to keep their position forever.
Is everyone entirely ignorant of the National Academies? Theyâre still there for Science, Engineering, and Medicine, and theyâre charged with advising congress.
I think the first two would be able to help alleviate some of the listed concerns here.
Iâm not sure where the OTAâs jurisdiction and the NAE & NAS would overlap or not.
Regardless, itâs my experience that legislators donât realize they have a collection of the nationâs best researchers at their disposal to answer questions for them.
Iâm 21 and love VCRs and Iâve still never bothered to set the clock on one.
The Academies donât quite respond to Congressional inquiries with the promptness of the OTA, since they have a much larger bailiwick to deal with.
Nah. The age thing had currency, once, but that was before seniors like my mum started building web sites for their quilting guilds and whatnot.
Put it this way: the computer whiz kids who played Pong and chatted on BBSs are now in their 40s and 50s. There just isnât an excuse anymore
Maybe if there werenât so many boomers still in officeâŚ
Honestly though, most in congress take a law and not a science path, which has more to do with it I think.
And to be elected their message has to have an emotional appeal, not necessarily a rational one.
Good point. Still, I wish more people would heed CP Snowâs Two Solitudes argument and take a more holistic approach to their education.
Our VCRâs 12:00 blinks, so I put a video tape in front of it. Works great.
At least we have some sort of âsmallerâ government.
Now excuse me while I think of fire held in a manâs hand.
Fire, a dangerous force, tamed at his fingertips at the burning point of a cigarette.
They are all in their 40s now probably being asked about why somebodyâs iphone wont connect to the exchange server.
Damn, I want a candy crapping unicorn now.
NASA is another classic example of politicians keeping a program as long as they can make political hay off of it, but as soon as their constituents want the money diverted somewhere else (or arenât looking), they drop it like a hot rock. Regardless of the benefits that have accrued from it meanwhile. The EPA likewise.
Republicans have cut pretty much all flavors of congressional staff, including not just the CRS and OTA but also the Government Accountability Office, and the staff for standing committees. According to The Washington Monthly a major effect has been to empower lobbyists:
Much of the research, number crunching, and legislative wordsmithing that used to be done by Capitol Hill staffers working for the government is now being done by outside experts, many of them former Hill staffers, working for lobbying firms, think tanks, consultancies, trade associations, and PR outfits. This has strengthened the already-powerful hand of corporate interests in shaping legislation, and given conservative groups an added measure of influence over Congress, as the shutdown itself illustrates.
There is some kind of excuse, but itâs not age. My dadâs had a work-related computer for at least 33 years, while I went through college having barely used a computer at all (though I caught up after I got out). Meanwhile he has relatives younger than him, who spent their careers working in offices, yet canât compose a legible email.
Now I canât remember what my point was⌠But Iâm thinking there was some congress critter who said some privacy issue was moot, he just simply didnât use email.
The EPA receives itâs fair share of abuse. âThugsâ is a surprisingly common epithet. Maybe I should stop reading Detroit water âarticlesâ.
They all blink when unset, to let you know that it isnât really 12:00. (It might be, but the odds arenât good.)
lol - you were âthat guyâ in class, werenât you?
He was usually right tooâŚ
Yeah, they say that, but reality is much more banal - because money.
this works exactly as good with moved scare quotes
Detroit "water" articles