Why (or why not) to vote for Bernie Sanders


Before I spend time watching a video… what’s your point?

1 Like

It explains how the electorial college is broken, and how a person with a stupidly low amount of public support can become president because of how the votes work. Not 49% more like… 29%.

1 Like

Latest national poll shows Bernie Sanders beating Scott Walker, Donald Trump and Jeb Bush


Also FTA:

…Polling out last week shows [Sanders is] the only candidate from either side who has a net favorability rating.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is increasingly becoming a liability. The “he can’t win” meme against Sanders is looking increasingly ridiculous.

1 Like

And, if the status quo thinks that’s bad for them… They’re in for a goddam hell ride after July 29th.

Meanwhile, the staff at Boing Boing seems really, really focused on Don Tramp and other gimmicks.

UPDATE: Good morning. As of 10:22 AM Colorado time we are now up to 100,196 people. Yes, that’s over one hundred thousand people.


Wallace made a difference, Perot and Nader didn’t much (no matter how much people like to blame him for 2000).


Why is the first thing I notice about that map the rather unusually placed event in… Calgary?

Did the Canadians give Alberta to the USA when I wasn’t looking? I could totally understand if they did, because, well, Stephen Harper.

They lost a lot of credibility with me after the climate change denial fiasco. Plus, they’ve been consistently wrong on Sanders over time. I think they embrace conventions too much and aren’t as open to broader dynamics as they should be.

That’s not to say I discount everything they say. They obviously have a good track record (depending upon the issue), but I take a lot of their opinions with a huge grain of salt.

All that said, I think it’s already conventional wisdom that Doneld Tramp (His name is parroted quite enough already on Boing Boing) could hurt Republicans with a third party run.

[quote=“Purplecat, post:218, topic:59394”]
Why is the first thing I notice about that map the rather unusually placed event in… Calgary?
[/quote]Random. It’s been expanded worldwide by popular request for Americans who are currently located overseas. You can click on it and talk to the organizer(s) themselves, if you’d like. It’s very transparent since this is a grassroots movement as apposed to Hillary’s opaque, gimmicky astroturf campaign.

1 Like

Because he’s an amusing and sad clown who thinks he’s a contender to be president?

[quote=“albill, post:220, topic:59394”]
Because he’s an amusing and sad clown who thinks he’s a contender to be president?
[/quote]My point is that Boing Boing focuses so much on him, but hardly gives someone like Bernie Sanders the time of day. There’s no balance there. It’s sad to see Boing Boing act like other mainstream media outlets instead of something more evolved. I expected better.


I suggest you bring it up with the editors that actually participate in these forums.

I have contacted all staff, publisher and “higher ups” at Boing Boing. @doctorow, to his credit, seemed to respond with this. However, that’s sadly been an anomaly and never repeated. The norm is every other candidate gets critical attention while Sanders gets the indifferent shrug from Boing Boing (overall). I like Boing Boing and I’ve supported them in ways they’ll never know, but I think this is a very disappointing situation.


So I’m going to this Sanders event tomorrow… We’ll see how this goes. I’m interested to see what others have to say and to hear Sander’s comments via the broadcast portion of the evening.


I suspect they give attention largely to the candidates they are mocking for doing and saying stupid shit.

Or perhaps it is…a conspiracy!

I suspect that they just don’t care.

Speaking of candidates who get an indifferent shrug, should Bernie Sanders lose the Democrats’ nomination and Jill Stein win (again) the Greens’, you will then campaign just as vocally for her as you are now for him, yes?

Here is her plan, which is much the same as it was in 2012, and the platform of the Green Party in general. They compare favorably, to say the least, with Sanders’s stance on the issues that led you to endorse him.

1 Like

Why bother? She can’t win.

The difference with Sanders is that if he gets on the ballot, he may actually be able to pull a win. A non-GOP, non-Democrat presidential candidate, while admirable, is unelectable at this point.


First, because there’s more to politics, and more to life, than who wins this election. Calling attention to Green principles increases the likelihood that they’ll be acted upon. I’ve seen simply reading the Green Party platform snap others out of their cynicism, turning them into activists. Hearing Greens speak has worked wonders too.

Campaigning for a Green presidential candidate, then, might put more Greens in office at other levels of government or widen the venues at which they can speak. (The Commission on Presidential Debates, founded by Democrats and Republicans, excludes them, and mainstream media ignores them, which may have to do with Green positions on media reform and corporate power in general.)

Ultimately what matters, though, is improving the world, whether or not those changes are brought by Greens or come from government at all. If, through a greater exposure to Green principles and the pressure that it precipitates, some other party introduces their policies, or some company acts with greater social, economic, or environmental responsibility, a victory has been won.

Second, because I for one won’t surrender what little agency I have in this political system by submitting to fear of a conservative win or otherwise letting the votes of others, rather than my conscience, decide my own. I hope someday you’ll join us.

Until then, I’ll point out that responses such as this

acknowledge a problem and in the same breath compound it.


Perhaps we’re right.

1 Like

No, I won’t. I will vote for Clinton.

The groundwork for a third party win hasn’t been laid yet. There’s no foundation. If there was, Sanders would have run as an Independent third party candidate.

Unfortunately, too many Greens don’t understand proper strategy and that’s why I can’t support them at this time. I support many of their views on important issues, but not their pipe dream strategies to get there. If Sanders wins, then I can certainly see doors opening up for progressive third parties in the next 5-10 years or so.

If Clinton wins we’ll be even further away. If a Republican wins, we’ll be decades away. I’m not going to sit and watch foundations for progressive third parties get derailed for decades (yet again).

I’ve been a part of grassroots groups that have been working towards realistic gateways for progressive third party adoption. I support realistic strategies that lay foundations for progressive third parties in the future and a Sanders victory is a vital part of it.

We’re not there now and part of the reason is too many progressives shoot themselves in the foot by letting the perfect be the enemy of good and treating solidarity like a dirty word.

A Sanders victory isn’t a pipe dream due to the fact that he’s running within an entrenched infrastructure as a reformer instead of outside of it as a “radical”.

I’ve said this from the very beginning in these forums and elsewhere… If Sanders had stupidly chosen to run as an Independent for this presidential race, I wouldn’t have supported him. He’s an Independent running against an establishment Democrat as a reformist Democrat. That’s the best we’re going to do in 2016. That’s our current reality.

We’re helping to lay the groundwork for future, progressive third party growth after Sanders wins. I hope you’ll join us today, JULY 29th, 2015 in making that happen.

This day will go down in the history books after all is said and done.


Good morning. As of 10:40 AM Colorado time we are now up to 100,637 people and rapidly climbing.

Yes, that’s over one hundred thousand people.

History is being made today… If some of you reading this still don’t understand the significance of July 29th, 2015… Don’t worry, you’ll read about it later in history books.

If you don’t want history to pass you by, there’s still time for you to join us today (see map link above) before the events start at a location near you.