Worst of McMansions: architectural criticism of inequality's most tangible evidence

I think part of my problem with this entire scenario is that it’s so privileged in many ways, with total ignorance of what it’s like for everyone else. Stretching financially to buy a $2-10M home instead of living comfortably and even luxuriously for significantly less, for what? Just to prove you’re keeping up with the (wealthy, white) Joneses?

Here are two well-built brick homes on the south side of Chicago. You can be downtown to work in 20 minutes, less if you take the train. The first has 6 bedrooms, 6 full baths, 2 partial baths, 6,243 square feet, 2-car garage, and is asking $649K. The second has 5 bedrooms, 4 full baths, 1 partial bath, 6,000 square feet, 2-car garage, and is asking $465K. What’s the catch? Racism.

14 Likes

Man I could sell my 3 bed 1.75 bath in Seattle and still have some pocket change for that beast of a house.
Real estate is crazy fucked up.

6 Likes

7 Likes

Here is a non-facebook link to the story… it’s worth the read:

6 Likes

That’s certainly an issue here. But its also an issue with the over priced houses, and has been for a long time. The bigger change right now, is that instead of houses being bought up as summer rentals. Places that will be vacant or rented at cut rates during the year, and then rented for the summers in 4-6 month blocks at much higher (unlivable) rates to make a profit. With air b&b they’re getting rented at even higher rates for just a few weekends a year. Pack a house with 10 people at $700 a night and you make the same money you would renting all year at reasonable rents with just weeks of occupancy. And critically, far lower expenses and effort.

That’s not a solution in anyway. That’s been one of the major problems in our housing for decades. For one these spaces. Illegal housing, and unlicensed rental houses are often rented out in the same way as seasonal tourist housing. Or at the same exorbitant, tourism inflated rates as anything else. The other thing that happens with them is they typically get turned into basically tenements for migrant farm laborers and impoverished immigrants. Large number of people packed in, nothing to code, no maintenance. There have been an increasing number of fires and a number of deaths the last two years.

Meanwhile we have pretty strict zoning regulations here. If and when multi-unit complexes are built they’re often (or can be) heavily restricted in terms of how they can be rented. Effectively barred from the tourist market. Provided they aren’t built as “for sale” apartments or as condos (the “affordable” condo for “young people” is a big thing here. $600k for 400 square feet and a $1k per month maintenance fee will solve our housing crisis!). More over half the issue with the rising rents and housing costs here (and most places) is down to a limited market. Geographically and in certain other ways we’ve got restricted space. Building is limited largely to high priced single family homes in pre-existing neighborhoods or on lots that already had smaller houses on them. They seldom add housing in terms of numbers of living spaces. And though there are many rental houses, they are outnumbered by owned houses. Often that sit vacant. Some sort of multi-unit housing would increase the overall supply of rental housing, which over time will push rents down, particularly if they’re of the sort we restrict from the tourist market.

Like I said its something that’s actively being fought and has been for decades including by me. We can’t exactly go and restrict voting rights for part time residents. That would be both wrong, and violation of federal and state law (people have tried!). The solution is in re-shifting the economy away from service/tourism model and towards something more stable, while creating an evironment where people can actually live here year round and raise their kids here. And that’s happening. State law changes mean our wineries can finally start selling their wine outside the state (Thanks Hillary!), though its taken them so long to realize they need to it might not work out. Breweries, boat building, and green energy (thanks Obama!) companies are starting to crop up all over. Our small plot size for farming is a natural fit for all sorts of high end pastured, rotation heavy, sustainable shit. And shellfish farming is a growing concern here (and one that’s basically going to save our wet lands if it hasn’t already).

But its fits and starts. Team NIMBY is currently doing everything it can to kill Aquaculture here. It apparently destroys the character of the region to keep multi-generation fishing families out of bankruptcy, clean our bays and marshes, and actually produce something of value to sell.

But it’s an investment! Real Estate never drops in value! We’ll sell for a profit before the mortgage ever becomes due!

I should move to Chicago. Or shit I never should of left Philly.

4 Likes

Wonderful. Cut corners aren’t often this potentially deadly. I’m really hoping this house you describe is somewhere that doesn’t get cold.

2 Likes

Thank you for that.
This is now a subject on which I am more than sufficiently well informed.

5 Likes

Mells war memorial? It’s quite close to where I live.
(I’ve wandered off topic, haven’t I?)

2 Likes

Well, it’s in California, in an area that doesn’t get fatally cold, so long as you have a roof over you. Still, the best case scenario is that they’re spending a lot more on heating/cooling than is remotely reasonable. Also I rather suspect it’s not up to code re: earthquake standards.

3 Likes

And increasingly subject to planning constraints because it creates conditions for flash flooding, sewer overloading and subsidence.
He says smugly, contemplating his soakaways and water collectors for watering. Very little of our rain ever reaches a sewer (though it does make it slowly to a ditch, thus to a stream, thence to a river, and finally down the Avon to the sea.)
But most people in urban environments don’t have the luxury of being able to do this. Even so, if they have to park their cars out front there are plenty of environmentally friendly solutions - they just cost a little more than hardcore and tarmac. And a lot less than subsidence.

3 Likes

Protip: they totes did. Is there a .GIF (flemish-tanged ‘guh’ w/notes of coliander and spruce, followed by a preternaturally soft “fffffff”) of John Lovett’s “Acting!!” but with him saying, “Culture!!” instead?

4 Likes

More than welcome… and remember what half the battle is…

18 Likes

When you have a theory, you have to test it!

2 Likes

The air conditioner for the wine closet! The electrified fence!

4 Likes

Clap your hands!

4 Likes

You can get it on your hands?

2 Likes

Only if you know it and you show it.

2 Likes

OT but I can’t help thinking of a former boss who wanted to buy a farmhouse. The first surveyor told the bank that the walls were made of mud and timber and that it was a very bad risk, liable to fall down at any moment.
But he then engaged a specialist surveyor who knew about old houses. This guy took test borings of the walls and reported to a different bank that the walls were solid, five feet thick at the base, were about five hundred years old and were, with reasonable maintenance, good for five hundred more. He got the loan.

Insulation? Between three and five feet of clay and wattle exceeds all current building standards. Just remember to replace the render every fifty years or so.

11 Likes

And borrowed the stone from the ruined abbey down the road.

You have to be ready to enforce laws against short-term rentals.

I’m not happy with the fact that the house next door has 6 unrelated people in it instead of the single family for which it is zoned, but I would be much less happy if it was replaced with a tower block.

3 Likes

27 solar panels? Cool.

4 Likes