So a mackerel then, is what you’re saying?
A toffee-nosed art expert would feign knowing of an artist known as Makerel and excuse himself.
BTW: This is art… or not to some. It is considered very important though because of its place in art history.
I believe you are thinking of Macquerel, one of the finest Rococo painters. His serving girl was sublime.
Bit of a stinker in his personal life, though. When the police questioned him about a local robbery, they had to grill him outside. Turns out he really was the thief, but he slipped right through their dragnet.
“Art is what you can get away with.”
No. The toffee-nose art critic was thinking of a “Makerel”.
Was it, really?
All white!
Touching on Kazimir Malevich again (who was quite the trailblazer) here’s another one of his pieces, titled White on White:
Not forgetting his Black Square period…
Banned and imprisoned for creating the purest abstraction.
I’ll give you 3 grand! 4! I must have it!
Sorry. I refreshed the page and… poof. Éphémères Nostalgique.
It looks like the AI is fixated on microbes.
Having seen the green one above and then the same artwork twice in a row I’m calling shenanigans.
ETA: Seems the “I did an AI” is, perhaps, less than honest. You get the same picture if you refresh twice in a short time-period, possibly a second. Which very strongly suggests mere randomness using the time as a seed. As I’ve said before, most of the applications of AI are like using a marching band to change a lightbulb. Admirable in execution, but really, why?
My stepmother has an artist’s studio in a block of them. This generated art is quite like a lot of the art produced there, although not hers. I guess there’s nothing to stop me from copying one in oils and flogging it. If they are generated one-offs, how could they prove provenance?
If I wanted to be the first and only person to see a work of art I’d just keep making my own art.
Well call me a contrarian, but I refreshed the page about a hundred times and saw some really gorgeous pieces. I wish they were higher resolution!
This many comments and not a single 1984 reference? Proles.
I think you’ve got them by the short (and curly) circuits.
It’s a brave new world.