Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2019/06/04/youtube-carves-policy-exceptio.html
Nothing to be proud of today
If they can shit can Alex Jones they can shit can this asshole.
ETA though considering how long it took them to shit can Alex Jones I wonât hold my breath.
Just content claim his shit.
Ban him the DMCA way. As long as weâre not fixing broken copyright law, we may as well use it to our advantage.
Shouldnât be too hard with a few hundred AWS instances spun up to get his channel locked and demonetized.
âToo big to failâ Not just for shitty multinational banks anymore.
So yeah. Like fascist, drunk or pedo.
Chowder is literally unparodably because it is impossible to top the hateful shit he says, retweets, and propogates. Still, comedy group The Serfs took a stab at it.
Hereâs their video essay and satire of Chowder, titled: Steven Chowder.
CW: literally quoting Steven C*owder
Click for video
Just flag the longer videos for nudity. Theyâll have to watch them to see where the nudity is. If they can hold their food down long enough to get through the video, they may be more inclined to ban him (actually having had to stomach his garbage).
Also, Iâve never actually wished that someone would develop clinical AIDS before because that seems like a horrible thing to think, but I may make an exception for this asshat. You have to be a special kind of asshole to think âAIDS is a hoaxâ.
I heard the new policy was if you can imagine Kirsty MacColl saying it in Fairytale of New York itâs ok, because who doesnât love Kirsty MacColl?!?
But it said it wouldnât be removing them, instead carving a policy exception for a prominent conservative voice.
Unless theyâre explicitly saying that âbigoted voice = conservative voice, therefore we have to allow it for balanceâ, YouTube has absolutely no rational or logical justification for doing this (the ethical and moral justifications are long gone at this point).
This Crowder sounds like a real sociopath.
Youtube has however demonetized Kirsten Weiss who makes fun and wholesome videos
about target shooting and trick shooting , e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8ZXKZ3MuhI
Bullying racist videos are fine, but wholesome shooting-sports-positive videos are treated like filth. YouTube has some real issues with their editorial policies.
There was actually an AIDS denial magazine
It went out of print because all the staff died of AIDS
This is the same YouTube that turns its logo rainbow-colored for Pride Month while running anti-LGBT ads on LGBT content, and even just straight-up demonetizing it for innocuous terms (they blame âthe algorithmâ for the latter, and push the work of preventing the former off onto individual content creators). They genuinely could not give less of a shit about the minorities being targeted on their platform, no matter how many rainbows they put in their Twitter avatars.
Thread:
YouTube doesnât give a fuck about queer creators.
True. But does YouTube give a fuck about heterosexual creators? Or anyone else? Not so much. You donât need to be homophobe to be a total dick. Sure, it helps a lot - but you donât need to be overspecific to call a dick a dick. Iâd even say the above is one of YTs lesser crimes as they just refuse to ban one guy on another guyâs request. They are OTOH banning plenty of creators every week because somebody else claims their content - without ever banning anyone for making false copyright claims.
Donât get me wrong - none of the above is justified in any way. They just have been dicks for a long time and thatâs not âOK as long as youâre not a bigot.â
Thereâs something so much more exhausting about this kind of blatant talking out of both sides of their mouths shit. Like, catching them in the double standard doesnât even feel like any kind of victory or gotcha because it feels like the whole point of what they were saying on twitter was to let us know the exception is not a mistake they made about policy or something they overlooked, it IS the policy.
Aaaaaugh Iâm tired.
Iâd bet money theyâve set it up so that the people who see the flagged content have zero discretion, and the people who have any discretion donât have to see any of the content. That was the upshot of that long piece about Facebook moderators that appeared in (Wired?) a while back.
For my money, sites like YouTube should give up on trying to eliminate what is bad. It means each red line they set up has a dollar cost attached â $20million to ban âfaggotâ, $31million to ban calling immigrants âscumâ â itâs absurd to imagine they can make unbiased moral judgments in that situation. Plus, I donât think itâs physically possible to do well at YouTubeâs scale.
Instead, they should let people say whatever horrible stuff they want, but they should only promote content that has been passed by human moderators. That is, anything YouTube recommends to you has to have been cleared by an actual person saying âYouTube is fine with anyone seeing thisâ.
That way, theyâre not âcensoringâ anyone â you can still mail the URL of your holocaust-denial video to both your friends â but YouTube hasnât incentivised itself to create an audience for every new piece of horrible shit that bubbles out of the sewer. In the long term there is no reason to think this would restrict the size of YouTubeâs business; theyâd still be showing ads to latent nazis, just like NBC and CBS always have, without needing to make actual Nazi programming.
YouTube has been pulling this anti-LGBT shit for years, demonetizing and deplatforming gay and trans people for no apparent reason, and refusing to enforce their own policies when gay people are victims of targeted harassment and doxxing on their platform. Iâm hoping that apparently making homophobic harassment an âofficially OKâ policy against a Vox editor, theyâve stepped too far and will have to fix things.
No. You are repeatedly, in multiple threads, using the hammer of âabsolutist free speechâ to defend bullies. Please donât do that.
You need to read my comments more carefully. Iâm actually arguing the exact opposite.
Profit before hate, profit before democracy. We are the United States of Profit.