doctorow at May 28th, 2014 15:00 — #1
stryxvaria at May 28th, 2014 15:41 — #2
How could they have passed up the opportunity to sue 1024 unnamed users? No, they had to sue the sum of all users.
jardine at May 28th, 2014 15:48 — #3
using the threat of having your name associated with "Anal Invaders XII"
When it comes to the Anal Invaders series, you need to follow the opposite rule as Star Trek movies. With Star Trek, it's the even-numbered movies that are good. With Anal Invaders, you really want the odd-numbered movies. Anal Invaders XII was a travesty. The plot was pointless and so more butts were pounded in BJ Gets a BJ. Stick with Anal Invaders III, VII, and XI. Those are the gems of the series. One star out of five.
mikekstar at May 28th, 2014 17:14 — #4
Anal Invaders I thru XI really exhausted the genre.
tac at May 28th, 2014 20:41 — #5
It is a shame that they sought account information from ISPs who do not offer service in the courts jurisdiction. Even without geolocation, trying to get information when the ISP & customer aren't under the jurisdiction is a stupid thing to do.
pjcamp at May 28th, 2014 23:24 — #6
I have to say, the nuclear Bozo is genius! Kudos to whoever the Photoshop wizard is.
bibulb at May 29th, 2014 02:25 — #7
I really think that you're giving some of the installments short shrift. Anal Invaders X holds up. I mean, yeah, it's primarily there to provide through-material to SET UP Anal Invaders XI, but it's still got its moments.
samthepea at May 29th, 2014 08:28 — #8
Back Door Sluts 9? That makes Crotch Capers 3 look like Naughty Nurses 2!
willondon at May 29th, 2014 21:54 — #9
I dunno. I only saw the trailer, but it was one of those trailers where you get the feeling you've pretty much seen the whole movie.
doctorow at June 2nd, 2014 15:01 — #10
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.