doctorow at August 16th, 2013 11:00 — #1
lasermike026 at August 16th, 2013 11:12 — #2
They say they are encrypting but we have do not have any real, tangible assurances of security or privacy from Google. Sorry, not buying it. TNO - Trust. No. One.
galaxies at August 16th, 2013 11:43 — #3
newliminted at August 16th, 2013 12:05 — #4
Great book, Cory. I enjoyed it. But unless Google is also encrypting all the email... this isn't much.
awjt at August 16th, 2013 12:31 — #5
A=1, B=2, C=3, etc... which is tantamount to having weak keys, obtainable keys, or having handed copies of the keys to the government. That's great they are encrypting, and all, yadda yadda, but dollars to donuts it's prone to break-in. BTW, loved Little Brother. It was awesome.
carlosdanger at August 16th, 2013 16:40 — #6
Only at BoingBoing can someone be honored and flattered to have been an inspiration for a website to encrypt user traffic : ) - - I guess you take 'em where you can get 'em
cowicide at August 16th, 2013 17:41 — #7
Cory, this is a nice gesture and perhaps a fantastic public relations maneuver for corporate damage control on Google's part.
But, what good is encryption when they hand the keys to the government anyway?
I mean, I get it... if everyone uses encryption, it doesn't stick out like a sore thumb when you do... but then Google needs to make encryption of Gmail messages ubiquitous if they REALLY want to make an impact.
Otherwise, this just rings hollow as a publicity stunt for damage control. Is this really a step in the right direction or just trying to give people a false sense of security when they use Google?
lurkinggrue at August 16th, 2013 18:58 — #8
People here are seriously not understanding this.
They moved to always on SSL but they also moved to Perfect Forward Secrecy that would prevent anybody from decrypting the ssl traffic after the fact even if google gives them the keys.
Little Brother was the inspiration.
lurkinggrue at August 16th, 2013 18:58 — #9
They are talking about SSL always on.
cowicide at August 16th, 2013 19:01 — #10
would prevent anybody from decrypting the ssl traffic
If you believe that then I've got some NSA privacy devices I'd like to sell you...
lurkinggrue at August 16th, 2013 19:12 — #11
Well actually it is believable because the technology is well known.
lurkinggrue at August 16th, 2013 19:12 — #12
cowicide at August 16th, 2013 19:34 — #13
Don't get me wrong, I think it's a step forward. And, it's not the PFS tech I'm worried about, it's going to be Google's particular implementation of it. Just color me skeptical for now.
kangorufoo at August 16th, 2013 21:01 — #14
Americans are victims of war crimes committed by the government and companies like google. Trust is gone. Everything has to change before anyone can trust again. In short, it's over. Time to start again.
bolamig at August 17th, 2013 01:30 — #15
Cory congrats. That's one for the digital headstone of life accomplishments.
agger_modspil at August 17th, 2013 05:47 — #16
Congratulations, Cory! This is really a very nice thing to have achieved.
And congratulations to the rest of us, who are frankly benefitting from Google's decision. All doubts about Google's respect for users' privacy, this shows how very important it is to tell people about encryption. This makes me proud to have organized a cryptoparty in my own town's main library back in February.
lemonl at August 17th, 2013 06:12 — #17
Increasingly BB = Cory PR machine
lemonl at August 17th, 2013 08:15 — #18
Cory seems to mainly banana related photos, post plugs for his own activity (fair enough as it is his blog), or posts which exists to include Amazon Affiliate links to products.
I don't mind Amazon Affiliate links as such, but when the only mentioned products are ones which can be linked to on Amazon... you start to wonder how objective the recommendation can be.
But if I don't want to know what Cory is up to, I have to ask: why am I here?
Compare it to kottke for example - I can't remember a post that is directly about Jason's other work. I think there may have been one to his wife a few years ago?
thaumatechnicia at August 17th, 2013 08:31 — #19
And also firstly: at least twice a week, I thank FSM for Leo Laporte.
It's so refreshing/encouraging to watch/listen to/participate in programs from a broadcaster whose hosts are well-informed, sharp, and whose default assumption is that their audience is often smarter than they are. It's like CBC's Ideas, esp. when Lister Sinclair was running the show.
My monthly contribution to TWIT isn't enough recompense for all they do.
(note to self: "increase TWIT donations...")
agger_modspil at August 17th, 2013 08:32 — #20
I don't know - follow the stories about Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, many aspects of pop and tech culture and take note of the constant erosion of our civil liberties higlighted not least by Cory's posts? Cory is a writer and has a legitimate reason to believe his readers might be interested in what he's up to.
If that kind of posts offend you, maybe this blog (or my blog, or that of any other published writer) is not for you.
next page →