doctorow at February 5th, 2014 11:05 — #1
vallindsay2 at February 5th, 2014 11:33 — #2
It's a simple rule that should be instituted; If you illegally delete evidence, automatic guilty verdict.
bloo at February 5th, 2014 12:25 — #3
If it "aged off" that might be used as evidence that he didn't receive a speedy trial..
jandrese at February 5th, 2014 12:32 — #4
I'm more concerned that evidence is deleted by some automatic process on their part. What happens if the guy appeals? If the working storage is really limited for some reason (and it had better be a good reason in this age of $100 3TB HDDs), then archive the data off before you delete it.
Maybe this was the whole MegaUpload filestore and it was really straining the servers? Even then, the deletion should have been a manual act done by someone who can be held accountable for not checking the status of the case before pressing the delete key.
miasm at February 5th, 2014 12:44 — #5
Ladies and gentlemen, Prime Minster John Key:
"This is a spy agency. We don't delete things. We archive them.''
"Essentially, legal documents that are created by GCSB are held in their system and archived for evidence. Raw intelligence has to actually, by law, age off the system if it's no longer relevant or required.''
smut_clyde at February 5th, 2014 15:04 — #6
NZ has dibs on the term "laughable bumblefuck" once the Canadians have finished with it.
doctorow at February 10th, 2014 11:05 — #7
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.