Warmth, irrationality, and transcendence!
Shouldn’t it be round?
Pi r not square, pi r round.
Cornbread r square.
That is clearly a mis-oriented Pac-Man sculpture, edibility is merely a by-product of the chosen media.
But a SQRT(2) fleece would be just as irrational, without all this silly transcendentalness.
You got it first, I came to add transcendental as well.
the ’ old crt phosphor " green on black is nice , but would not RASPBERRY be even nicerest as a colour option for this ??
It’s not transcendent. It’s not even irrational. Hell, it’s not even pi - just a cheap imitation. The second you run out of fleece, you’ve got a rational number.
Unless you consider the possibility that … is actually short-hand for the irrational number (10410π - 314159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706798214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120190914564856692346034861045432664821339360726024914127372458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160943305727036).
Also, I count 411 digits aside from that. Where are the remaining 5 and 7 we were promised?
Ah but is that a rational ellipsis, or an irrational one? I have a truly marvellous proof, but this comment board is too small to contain it.
Boundegar’s last theorem?
(would <3 but on enforced cool-down)
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
