maggiekb at April 21st, 2014 12:24 — #1
crenquis at April 21st, 2014 13:28 — #2
It would be nice to be able to read the paper. Since 10Be tends to deposit in soil/sediment/dust, perhaps it has just built up over the years from melt water at the bottom of the glacier. There is also the confounding factor from 10B -- if not separated, AMS has trouble distinguishing 10Be from 10B.
Edit: I see that their methods/etc doc is available to view. Methods seem ok -- I guess that they are basing their soil claim on the observed Carbon and Nitrogen ratios in the samples.
iponokaoi at April 22nd, 2014 07:29 — #3
Maggie, I love reading articles like that. I just don't have anything to say.
pixleshifter at April 22nd, 2014 14:47 — #4
A thin, silver lining on the ice melting, is that we may discover great fossils beneath. It's always fascinated me what lays underneath all that ice.
crenquis at April 22nd, 2014 15:02 — #5
Even the geologically recent ones are fascinating:
maggiekb at April 26th, 2014 12:24 — #6
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.