Yes, that one stood out as a J6 convict who was more violent and received significantly more leniency.
Sure, but in that specific case I’m sure the article would have referred to a plea bargain, because such a bargain must be disclosed (see Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure)
In my understanding this would depend on the type of plea deal, the court will be bound by a plea bargain according relating to section 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure once the court accepts that bargain. Otherwise the defendant can withdraw their plea.
Also a plea deal according to section 11(c)(1)(A) would also de facto bind the court, because the prosecution will agree to not bring or move to dismiss certain charges, and the court can only sentence the defendant for the remaining charges.
Therefore these types of bargain are what a competent defense will seek, because the outcome for the client is advantageous, either charges are dismissed entirely, or the defendant can at least withdraw their plea if the court does not agree.
Either way, the teacher can appeal that sentence, and they should.
The “court” referred to here is synonymous with the judge. The judge never has to accept a plea bargain worked out between the prosecutor and the defendant.
Of course the judge does not have to accept. But in the scenario I described the defendant can withdraw their plea if the judge does not accept the plea bargain.
The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are quite clear on that.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.