6th cop suspended from Memphis force over Tyre Nichols killing

Originally published at: 6th cop suspended from Memphis force over Tyre Nichols killing | Boing Boing

14 Likes

Betty White Dab GIF

Of course. Watch, here is where the union steps in.

27 Likes

It’s clearly just the light from his bright future and good family messing with the color balance. Getting the exposure right can be finicky.

17 Likes

Even if he didn’t do the kicking or stomping, surely he’s an accomplice?

5 Likes

Well an accomplice is just a participant in the crime, and would be charged with the same crime. So I guess here the question would be whether or not the tasing was part of the beating that led to Nichols’s death. I would say yes, but it’s probably a tougher prosecution, if I had to guess. That being said…arrest every MFer who was involved in that incident that night and charge them all with murder. Charge them with all the lesser included offenses possible. Charge them with conspiracy. Charge them with felony murder. Charge them with everything. Throw the book at all of them just like prosecutors do all the time when they aren’t cops. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

13 Likes

And dig up every little thing about their past that suggests they are “no angel” and bring them up whenever possible in both the court of public opinion and the court of law.

8 Likes

Can’t qwhite put my finger on it.

11 Likes

What? That chocolate milk mustache doesn’t count for anything? /s

9 Likes

I wish that these cops would face, as a portion of their imprisonment, a daily ritual of being forced to run laps until they vomit/collapse. But first, a little pepper spray in the face, for extra motivation. Yeah I know, cruel and unusual. But what do they care about constitutional rights?

1 Like

They all violated his constitutional rights.

3 Likes

True, but any crimes involving depriving Nichols of his Constitutional rights would be federal charges. That will be a completely separate process, and it’s a separate jurisdiction. I’m all for it, though. Throw the book at them. Throw all the books at them. Here’s the federal law that would be appropriate, if anyone is curious.

2 Likes

(source: NYT 02/01)

Culture of impunity

The Memphis police officers charged in the death of Tyre Nichols were part of an elite unit known as Scorpion that was set up to crack down on high-crime neighborhoods. The officers’ actions as they stopped and beat Nichols show how the squad’s work could, and did, go very wrong.

Stories of botched work by special law enforcement units are notably common in the U.S. In Baltimore, members of a gun-tracing task force robbed residents of cash, drugs and jewelry. By the time federal officials investigated the New Orleans Police Department in 2010, residents perceived its special units as corrupt and brutal. In Los Angeles, a “special investigation section” in the 1990s was involved in multiple deadly shootouts. There are many more examples.

Police departments establish these squads with a good intention: addressing a genuine crime problem. But they fall short in the implementation — tainted by poor leadership, the wrong benchmarks or a culture of impunity.

Today’s newsletter will explain how Scorpion, which officials in Memphis disbanded last week, fit into a broader pattern in American law enforcement of well-intentioned efforts to fight crime instead leading to abuses.

A sound idea

The Memphis Police Department founded the Scorpion unit in late 2021 to do what officials call “hot-spot” policing.

For regular readers of this newsletter, the term may sound familiar. The idea is to focus police resources on high-crime neighborhoods or city blocks or even people (such as repeat offenders). They can also zero in on specific crimes, like shootings or drug trafficking.

The term is broad, and over time just about every big-city police department in the U.S. has said it is focusing on hot spots in some way. When done correctly, the strategy reduces crime without simply displacing it to other areas, studies have found.

But those three words are the catch: when done correctly. “When people use the term ‘hot-spot policing,’ that could mean lots of different things,” said Anna Harvey, a public safety researcher at New York University.

Many departments ignore important tenets of the concept, sometimes resulting in abuses. For example, the Louisville, Ky., police unit that investigated Breonna Taylor’s ex-boyfriend was also following a hot-spot model. (Officers shot Taylor to death in her home in 2020.)

In some hot-spot efforts, police officers merely try to make their presence known — to produce a kind of scarecrow effect, as people are less likely to commit crimes in front of an officer. In others, officers aggressively enforce the law with as many stops and arrests as possible. Exemplary hot-spot policing demands a balancing act between maximizing the deterrence of officers’ presence and minimizing the social costs of hassling, stopping and arresting more people.

“You can do hot-spot policing in a way that’s super aggressive, or you can do it in a way that’s more respectful,” said Neil Gross, a sociologist at Colby College who studies the police.

Flawed implementation

So what went wrong in Memphis? Officials appeared to emphasize the wrong things, experts said.

Police officials deployed Scorpion to the city’s most volatile neighborhoods — “hot spots” — to crack down on all sorts of crimes, like reckless driving or shootings, with punitive tactics even against minor offenses.

City officials praised Scorpion for high arrest numbers, effectively encouraging aggressive tactics. Chief Cerelyn Davis lauded the approach, advocating “being tough on tough people.” (Officials could have emphasized other goals, like reductions in crime rates in specific neighborhoods, to help focus officers on results instead of antagonistic methods, experts said.)

“It’s the command staff implementing a version of hot-spot policing that is not consistent with what the research evidence says is best,” Harvey said.

The unit also seemed captured by a culture of impunity. Consider that at least some of the officers who beat Nichols were wearing cameras that were recording their actions. The fact that they punched and kicked Nichols anyway suggests that they thought they were above the law and could get away with it, said Richard Rosenfeld, a criminologist at the University of Missouri-St. Louis.

It is a common phenomenon among American police departments: Evidence-based policies can fall apart in their implementation. Researchers can call for law enforcement strategies that focus on specific places and people and try to minimize the social costs. But if those ideas are filtered through a culture or leadership style that prizes toughness and aggressive action, they can lead to abuse.

2 Likes

An aggressive prosecutor’s argument might be that the tasing was intended to enable the beatings because of what that officer said: “I hope they stomp his ass.”

3 Likes
2 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.