Up until the debates, where Hillary held up against his bullying and magnified it whereas he’d just do his usual “whip his flacid dick out and mushroom-stamp the other participants” shtick while the moderators stared.
Hillary is a better strategic candidate, Bernie is an awesome candidate but would have held up poorly against a pathological liar-clown. Those “electability” polls you quote are not static, the media encourage him to bully unchecked.
I can’t say how Bernie would have fared against Trump, except that Trump’s undoing and implosion in the debates has been his own fault. If only he would stay undone…
Yes, there’d be Commie Bernie attacks, but I’m not aware that a significant percentage of the country literally thinks he’s a demon. And he hasn’t had 20+ years of being the pinup figure for conservative hate.
A lot of the criticism and hatred of Clinton is based on nothing, but it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
They would attack him for being Jewish and/or atheist, and make disingenuous claims that he’s a communist, Marxist, Stalinist, etc. Still, polling indicates that he would have been more electable than Hillary.
Neutral to the former, because he’s leftist, and worse to the latter, because socialists are vastly hated. I long for a time when Trumps aren’t coddled and endorsed by the media and when a candidate like Sanders would be given equal respect.
Beats taking them at face value, taking them seriously, or treating them as earnest partners in conversation (nevermind policy negotiations).
These are the “blame you first” crowd. They’re too ingrained in their ignorance to change now, and they lack the wisdom to sit down and let cooler heads prevail.
That leaves the choice to ignore them, or mock them. I choose mock them.
You rather didn’t. Perhaps you could expand you analysis so that your passing references are fleshed out into more cogently made actual full points. Like, two sentences each, not three things you point at in one sentence and expect us to know why you think they;re connected. Because you didn’t explain that part, not really.
Same as X isn’t a citation. Same as X because A B and C as shown in D and E… is.