AI system looks at faces and rates them for responsibility, happiness, aggression, attractiveness, weirdness, and emotional stability

The penny drops :wink:

2 Likes

Friendly, Outgoing, Attractive…

2 Likes

What kind of statement is that? Next you will be claiming CMOs based on sub prime mortgages aren’t any safer than the underlying mortgages

1 Like

The Greater Fool Theory; it’s now the law.

My sincere apologies.

I had thought the second last paragraph of the original post about modifying the secondary test subjects to match their rating would key people in, but given that I often don’t read posting that carefully, why should I expect anyone else to.

Anyway, by then I was having too much fun. Again, sorry if my lark offended.

In other words, the system can identify a stable genius?

I think you just got bitten by the Bird of Parody :wink:

How do we rate the AIs?

Having a bad day? You best turn that frown upside-down, Mr. Gloomy, or it will get much, much worse!

Anyone talking about how this might exclude designer/programmer prejudices? This includes but is not limited to race, sex, class, income, and sexual desirability.

Looks like junk science at best and screening for future unemployment (or genocide) at worst.

I’d love to see the training set for “weirdness”.

1 Like

Just yearbook after yearbook from the 1980s

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.