If all men were brothers, would you let one marry your sister?
Mod note: Itâs getting hot in here, so turn off all your snark.
âŚ
âŚ
âŚ
âŚ
âŚand thatâs what I think about that.
âbest youâve ever seen class ofâ contains no i.
Oh, I see. n1**er.
L337speak.
Ok. Thatâs fair.
No and I didnât comment on that. I commented on whether this was a âthreatâ and âintimidationâ by these folks.
I think the intent and audience have some effect on whether this was meant as a threat to other students, as opposed to people being racist assholes.
Calling people the ânâ word is not something one does as an act of rebellion normally. It is much more commonly the act of a racist shit. Hell, I wonât even type the word here because of the social context of it (and social conditioning).
Yes but you generally donât hear it coming out of the mouths of non-black folks unless someone wants a beating. I have black friends and neighbors. If I hear them say the word, thatâs their business and within their community. As a white man, if I said it to anyone (especially one of them), I really would expect to get punched in the face.
Iâd be rather careful with that line of logic - it would imply that hate speech towards Muslims is not nearly as bad.
Personally, Iâd stick with the powerlessness of the victims as a reasonable yardstick for offensiveness.
For example, as a straight, white, nominally Christian, middle-class male, Iâm pretty much immune to any racial or gender-based insults. After all, I have all the power, and any threat implied by the insult is essentially farcical. Racial or gender based insults against the powerless, on the other hand, have a long history of being a prelude to actual violence, be it physical, economic or simply emotional.
Holier than thou achievement unlocked!
I will only say this: I think the fun is that itâs offensive, not that itâs racist.
Said Jewish kid would be well advised to avert her eyes when in the Indian quarter of many cities and not to look too closely at the pre-WWII altar dressings in many European churches. The Nazis merely appropriated and debased a very old good luck symbol. Not everyone thinks Hitler when they see one even now.
Would you mind further explaining that? Because so far, it doesnât make sense.
I canât help but say, given the context here of American school property, âSo what?â
Iâm fairly certain those sniggering classmates had the Hindu swastika in mind when they slapped it on the Jewish kids locker.
I donât want to come down TOO hard on the kids - Iâm hoping they are doing the teenager thing of not really thinking through their action and all of the people it will affect, just being all âhur dur we can spell a curse word derpy doo.â Iâd hope they would learn a few lessons from this, likeâŚ
- Itâs still racist even if you didnât MEAN to be racist.
- Thereâs a reason that word is different than words like shit and fuck and other curse words.
- Donât think that snapchat is going to mean evidence gets removed - the computer is a machine for making copies.
- You maybe should start hanging out with more black people.
These kids seem ignorant to me rather than creatures of deliberate ill intent - educate them, and youâll make something constructive out of their dingus behavior.
The offence isnât in the symbol itself, its in the use of it in that context. My point being that someone brought up to abhor the swastika without an appreciation of the depth of its history outside of WWII is likely to make an idiot of themselves when it appears in an innocent context. But that would probably occur outside the US, so maybe it doesnât matter to you?
Pretty certain they didnât have the Greek or Scandinavian variety in mind either.
But if that kid is only ever taught swastika = Nazism = reminder of the Holocaust, then he would be unnecessarily scandalised by the rather nicely embroidered kurta I found in an Indian clothing store this afternoon âŚ
Jesus, this is how I want to treat all young kids exhibiting signs of racism/sexism/other lack of empathy. Just make them walk a day or two in that personâs shoes. You catch as much as you can while theyâre young, theyâll end up being better people for it.
Youâre right, it doesnât matter in THIS context, that is, this thread, because itâs a thread about racism in an American school. Itâs not a thread about the arbitrary nature of social symbols. Which is why I donât see why you think youâre saying something relevant, or even all that new â I imagine most readers here already realize that the Swastika is an appropriated symbol. And if American children were taught more widely that it is, sure, they wouldnât be alarmed by seeing one in an Indian clothing store, but they would be, and appropriately so, by seeing one scrawled on a school wall or some Jewish kidâs locker.
I wanted to respond seriously, but for all we know the student who received and reported the snapchat was a person of color and youâre suggesting they should be punished more than the white people going around brandishing the N-word⌠So⌠I just canât.
Maybe not a direct threat of violence, but it certainly furthers an atmosphere which encourages white students to accept the dehumanization of their black peers. Dehumanization can certainly lead to more violence against the black peers. Itâs not a direct appeal to violence, but itâs not exactly helpful, either.
Mmm hmm. And Iâd add that dehumanization IS a form of violence.