Originally published at: Authorities forbid drinking ancient champagne found in shipwreck - Boing Boing
…
That’s why it would be better to go on this expedition:
Just recently viewed for the first time (on a mission to watch all Ealing studios films) “Whisky Galore!” (1949). The plot hinges on a ship-wreck nearby a Scottish island which contained a whole lot of whiskey (‘e’ optional). The novel and subsequent film were based on a real ship-wreck in 1941, that of the SS Politician. …makes one gormlessly wonder if there could be whiskey bottles yet to find.
from the above wikipedia site: orange dot site of wreck
Luckily this is already in the Endless Arguments wiki, so we don’t have to relitigate it here. That said, the e is not optional, it’s plain wrong in this case.
ok, but which way is it “wrong”? [wink]
In 1997, a German freighter ran ashore on Scilly (off the coast of Cornwall), carrying a load of containers holding car tyres, doors and tobacco.
My dad was in the building trade on the mainland at the time and said they couldn’t sell a single door on Scilly for several years - and all the cars over there had excellent tyres.
I’m sure several kilos of tobacco were recovered from the ship by the official salvors.
Someone is going to open a bottle, right? For science?!
I’ll grab my pack. Anyone here have a ship?
“Champagne Bear”, the sequel about a polar bear getting tipsy on an excellent bottle of champagne on a shipwreck, and then wistfully going on quests to other wrecks to find similar vintages, lacks the oomph of the original movie.
I’m more likely to watch it though (I really enjoyed the trailer for cocaine bear but felt that was enough, I didn’t need to spend two hours to see it extended) but a bear going all Paddington on fine champagne rather than marmalade sandwiches? I’m in.
I mean, probably literally
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.