the best criterium.
10 Likes
So are strawman arguments, but ones own oppressive acts always feel like a check against the oppressions put upon us. Here’s to hoping you cheer up.
4 Likes
Most people’s opinions of Assange seem to depend on whether or not he’s on their team.
2 Likes
Yes, never before has a purer bunch of ideologues been gathered in one place.
3 Likes
Examples?
They actually think they matter 
1 Like
You tell me. You had a both sides of a conversation with @nemomen there.
I’m just gonna sit here and wait to be told by you what I think. Same outcome as if I did it myself.
4 Likes
So you are unwilling to demonstrate how you decide which intelligence agencies are acting in good faith and when to believe them? This sounds like incredibly important and useful information, why wouldn’t you want to share it with the rest of us?
Oh I’m sorry, I was thinking of the “j” spelling. Try jēf.
5 Likes
I am demonstrating precisely that. About decisions, intelligence, good faith, and belief.
3 Likes
Sorry, CNN stands behind their report. If I have to pick between the likelihood of CNN, after being called out and vigorously reviewing their info, and it STILL being fake, or 4chan, I’ll take the former every time.
I think, though, that regardless of the validity of the report, this event will make “fake news” a nonpartisan issue now.
5 Likes
So instead of responding you honed in on a typo? And then ad hominem?
You know better than I do what I was doing, report as responsibly as you deserve.
but i’ve added no homonyms. (oh, wait, there I just did)
3 Likes
In which the NYT out themselves as Journalistic weasels:
Quote:
But if Mr. Putin and his agents wanted to entangle Mr. Trump using business deals, they did not do it very successfully. Mr. Trump has said he has no major properties there, though one of his sons said at a real estate conference in 2008 that “a lot of money” was “pouring in from Russia.”
Surely any investigative Journalist worthy of that description would could at least attempt to find out whether trump has financial interests in Russia. That is after all the key question here. And even in Russia it must be possible to get a sense of who owns what.
4 Likes
The criterion is to know that the plural is criteria, whereas a criterium is a bicycle race?
4 Likes
is that one a them bigly wheeled bicycle races?
(heck, i didn’t even notice the typo, but apparently I got all ad hominem about it)
http://m.thewhistle.com/media/uploads/other_sports/2ub35.gif
1 Like
Lol. You edited the ad hominem out in your post and then posted this. That’s cute.
well that’s just a lie. @Falcor, can you verify that I did no such thing and -maybe- get rid of this disruptive joker for a day, please.
2 Likes
Not to mention, the report in question was compiled by an ex-MI-6 operative. The BBC is also reporting this as something to take seriously, and while they’re not perfect they’re no slouches news-wise. So this isn’t merely a question of whether or not we trust the FBI/NSA/CIA/etc.
9 Likes
Which would you recommend?
2 Likes
