Originally published at: Britain's "worst necrophiliac killer" was given free access to corpses for 15 years | Boing Boing
…
3 Likes
11 Likes
Cameras everwhere, but never in the same room as liabilities.
Especially when the liabilities are white men like this creeper. I’m sure the Tories are funding a special AI project that will automatically wipe or obscure themselves and those they serve from the always-expanding UK surveillance network.
8 Likes
That Guardian article just got worse and worse.
5 Likes
“Worst” is not really applicable when certain qualities are being measured. It’s not like there’s a “best” necrophiliac killer. The entire population of necrophiliac killers is essentially a non-competing group where each one is the worst, I should think. In stats terms, I would use a nominal scale rather than an ordinal one.
7 Likes
Since we’re down to the nits, I would suggest that killer necrophiliac describes the person better than necrophiliac killer. The latter sounds like someone who kills necrophiliacs.
5 Likes
Seems appropriate, and I’m sorry
1 Like
5 Likes
Yeah, unfortunately this guy seemed really good at being a murderous neophiliac.
1 Like
In the US and under a Trump presidency, enough money would buy this monster a pardon.
2 Likes
Reminds me a tad about the controversy over the Monty Python sketch where starving British sailors in a lifeboat discussed who would cannibalize who, with that being portrayed as a long-standing tradition in the British Navy. The joke was not appreciated.
4 Likes
Don’t think the Tories wouldn’t find a way to get him off the hook if he had both big money and a big title.
2 Likes
Are there very many other necrophiliac killers?
1 Like
The old adage of “don’t ask questions whose answer you don’t want to know” is strong right now. I’d recommend avoiding asking Google. Particularly over lunch. The short answer is “yes, depending on your definition of ‘’very many.’”
2 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
