I’m still bitter that Northern growers campaigned against prop 19. Morally indefensible, no matter what nonsense excuses they came up with to try to convince people they weren’t just worried about profits. Fucking baptist and bootlegger coalitions.
At least this time around there are some other states to point to and say, look the sky didn’t fall. And they specifically expanded the prop language to take into account criticisms of prop 19. I’m a lot more optimistic this time.
I hate, hate, hate the term “pot” as referring to cannabis. It IMO sounds stupid. And it is, if I am not mistaken, short for “potion” when cannabis is hardly ever prepared or consumed as a potion.
My understanding is that “pot” is a short for potiguaya (spanish) from potación de guaya - marijuana buds steeped in alcohol. In rural Mexico, it’s quite common to find potiguaya in the home being used like we use bengay to relax and sooth sore muscles or sipped for stomach pain and nausea. Many homes have a plant in the yard just for making potiguaya.
It’s entirely unclear to me that big money special interests will prevail in 2016. Colorado, Washington, Alaska and Oregon are not foundering in misery & depravity due to legalization. The non-event nature of legalization in these states makes most anti-legalization arguments look asinine… or blatantly self-interested.
California is yuge!, and newsworthy because of it, but a legalization initiative is also up for vote in neighboring Nevada. Does anyone know the status of other state-level legalization pushes?
“Marijuana is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind… Most marijuana smokers are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana usage.” —Harry Anslinger, from Marijuana: Assassin of Youth (1937) [source]
Anslinger was the director of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics from 1930 to 1962 and spearheaded the campaign to impose a federal ban on cannabis.
It first appears in the English language in Hubert Howe Bancroft’s The Native Races of the Pacific States of North America (1873).
The “mexican” etymology Anslinger liked to push in the 1930’s was a false one. The word likely originates from the Chinese for hemp seed flower - ma ren hua or possibly from mejorana.
Oh, definitely. His popularization of the term (from Spanish marihuana) [see @anotherone’s post just above on its actual etymology] was a deliberate tactic in his efforts to get it banned.
It will be interesting to see just what kinds of moralistic handwringing will be used by the anti- side. In Oregon they tried to claim that people would be giving out edibles as Halloween candy. It was pointed out by a lot of people that no one would be doing that because edibles are expensive.
So far the only “Refer Madness” I have seen is from the people who want to ban it.