Canadian government records censored with Scotch tape, paper

No doubt because the step was covered with paper and scotch tape.

6 Likes

The rooms are known as secure compartmentalized information facilities, or SKIFs.

I’m not doubting the story overall, but it troubles me that the author can write out Secure Compartmentalized Information Facility and then proceed to initialize it with a ā€œKā€ multiple times.

3 Likes

Lest we forget.

2 Likes

There are any number of old regulations that specify that requests be submitted ā€œOn official letterhead,ā€ as if that implied any level of authentication in this day and age.

Actually, my guess is that the workflow went something like this…
Low Level Flunky copies the document gives it to the Document Reviewer and puts the origial back in storage… DR scans through the document and applies paper. DR give the document to LLF and says that ā€œi’m done reviewing this.ā€ He means that he’s finished the actual thinking part of the process, after all operating a xerox machine is a job for LLF. But what LLF understands that to mean is "this is ready to ship.

I’ve been using ā€œKā€ as an abbreviation for ā€œconstantā€ for so many years that it genuinely surprises me when I do it while teaching and my students call me on it.

We’re adorable!

Please do not remove this Post-It.

5 Likes

Wait… Ramsey?

I think it’s more likely someone elided the originals, made careful xeroxes, and then accidentally mailed the wrong pile

1 Like

The US did the equivalent with electronic documents for a while until there was a published guideline and widespread training…

1 Like

The guidelines are still left to interpretation. You can get a lot of info by comparing a single document redacted by 2 different people.

1 Like

On the up side, the next time someone redacts a PDF by putting an opaque box over text, we’ll have a great simile to explain why that doesn’t work

2 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.