Continuing coronavirus happenings (Part 1)

24 Likes

“Cover all your faceholes!”

20 Likes

That would include ears too…

12 Likes

Don’t forget the pores:

18 Likes

“WHAT?”

:wink:

14 Likes

Your ears are on your face?

[drastically revises mental image of @Melizmatic]

12 Likes

Technically, the eyes count too…

12 Likes

Seriously, this is also true, at least on the receiving end of the virus. Glasses or goggles recommended.

15 Likes

Especially if @beschizza has been at work.

20 Likes

Been wearing a pair of these when I’m out walking. (No relation to the vendor other than as a customer.) ANSI Z87.1 compliant (the wraparound goes back far enough to count as side shields), >0.999 UVB/UVC blocking, and they’ve got cheaters so I can read my phone. (And they don’t look atrociously nerdy. I’ve even seen a picture of Barack Obama wearing what look to be the same glasses.)

5 Likes

Goddamit, this is not how this fucking works! :exploding_head: Oh, this winter will be fun…

13 Likes

UVA has tracked all healthcare worker Covid acquisition, and found that 100% (of a fairly small sample) were not wearing goggles at the presumed time of exposure. Obviously not directly applicable to the general population, but still food for thought.

17 Likes

Some information for any US citizen who might have thought they were ineligible for a $1200 stimulus check, due to homelessness or currently residing outside the country.
I thought to post this after meeting a Latino man here in Tijuana who has US citizenship because he was born in Queens, NYC. He was not aware he was eligible for a check.

17 Likes

Hopefully it’s not single use.

6 Likes

President Robert Robbins the next steps in campus reentry will depend on how well the disease is controlled.

That is such fundamentally dishonest bullshit. You have to decide on next steps now, so it “depends on how well the disease is controlled” — now. So, how well is it controlled now? And don’t tell me “Well, cases are coming down.”: is it controlled? No, it is not, not even close. If cases come down at this rate consistently then…December?

What he means, what they all mean, is “we will look for any single out-of-context statistic that can be interpreted as positive, and then we’re going to start murdering again.”

12 Likes

The states seem to be going for the “positivity rate”, tests vs positives. The number of positives are rising, but the numbers of tests are rising more, so the positivity rate is going down…

The going concern though is as we get into colder weather, the amount of virus we are in contact with when we get sick is going to be higher, in enclosed places. That means it is harder to fight off the virus, and the death rate goes up, irrespective of the positivity rate.

2 Likes
7 Likes

Interesting article here about the effectiveness of contact tracing, showing the importance of local knowledge in working out how the spread has occurred

Key quote

That “richness of local knowledge” can help to identify where clusters are coming from, he says. For example, local tracers were able to establish a cluster of cases in a factory came from the community, not the factory - it was just there that they were being spotted. Local tracers knew workers at this particular factory mostly lived in one area, in buildings containing lots of different households, and many shared cars into work.

13 Likes

Via The Shirk Report:

30 Likes

“Some”?

18 Likes