It’s not like I don’t agree with your point, but I feel you’re missing mine.
If a person becomes part of an institution like the police, and then goes on to embrace many of the failings of that institution, thus becoming assimilated into an inhuman (or at the very least inhumane) monster, how are we to regard them?
Yeah sure, they’re still literally humans, etc - in my book that should go without saying. My point is that if dehumanisation is ever justified, these are the guys to dehumanise. It’s the sheer scale of it; they wantonly inflict lasting misery, with widespread, regular persistence on a proportion that dwarfs the contribution to human misery made by two categories of people folks are most encouraged to dehumanise, namely terrorists and paedophiles. And these guys do it with relative impunity.
We’re told that some people are so terrible that it’s okay to throw away the rulebook when dealing with them, and we both know that’s utter bullshit. But what about the rat bastards who take advantage of their position to piss all over the rulebook, or rewrite it as it suits them?
What can we do about these people, aside from back the odd good apple to the hilt? We’re bloody impotent; the only recourse we have is the complete fuck you.
…Which isn’t how I regard the cops per se (wary suspicion is more like it); it should also go without saying the complete fuck you is reserved for those who’ve individuals who’ve demonstrated their own heinous lack of humanity.
I think there’s perhaps a very specific place for dehumanisation, and rather than that specifically being the problem, it’s actually just prejudice (as usual).