Either way, it was something he had the right to possess.
2 Likes
I think part of the professional aspect of the job is being willfully out to NOT murder someone.
5 Likes
Minnesota requires training for a CWP, which specifically covers “instruction in the fundamental legal aspects of pistol possession, carry…” (Statute 624.714). One of the topics is specifically police encounters and how to appropriately address them..
This differs per state but Minnesota doesn’t appear to have a duty to inform, only to inform if asked (same statute). The other aspect is that another option was to have provided the license along with the concealed weapons permit when the license was requested by the officer before saying anything. Since this depends upon the state, I don’t want to speculate too much about interpretations for Minnesota.
Speaking from a much broader perspective, this link sums it up pretty well.
“Once the officer approaches and begins speaking with you, make sure that he/she knows what you’re going to do. Tell them where your hands are going and why. The officer should be giving very specific directions to control your actions, so do exactly as told.
…
If asked for your identification, let the officer know where it is and what you have to do to retrieve it. This is the perfect time to explain that you’re a CWP holder, that you are armed, and where your handgun currently is. Many states have made it mandatory to provide your CWP permit with your license during a traffic stop. Just make sure that when you mention CWP, firearms, or anything else that could be perceived as a threat, that your hands are clearly visible, your voice is calm, and you don’t do anything without letting the officer know before hand.”
Both had training (and in much different quantities), but the far larger mistake or mistakes (plural) were made by the officer. This cannot be denied in the least.
Perhaps at this point, speaking words to a police officer in certain regions equates suicide?
1 Like
That reads like some well crafted victim blaming. Why are you defending power? It won already.
and, welcome new community member.
4 Likes
The long answer is very long, and involves stuff like cultural problems, indoctrination and psych programming etc etc but the short answer is simple: They enforce the will of those with power. Those with power are above the law.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
