I guess you’re talking about this:
That wasn’t the only thing I said in that post, just the only thing you chose to respond to. Here’s the meat of what I said there:
In the third post in this thread, I said:
And so far, @W96 is living down to the accusations I leveled.
And for all the talk of banning for dissenting opinions, which categorically is a derail of the original topic (you know, the only other thread than this one that you’ve ever posted in) neither you nor the other police apologist have been banned.
Are you disappointed? Because it sure does weaken what you said here:
and here:
I called out a stunt account who had made a factually incorrect statement, and chose to ignore photographic evidence of a cop who aimed his weapon at a photographer.
You chose to interpret that as BoingBoing being notorious for banning commenters who didn’t have the right opinions, purely because of those opinions.
That’s a derail.
