I was sued for $1,000,000 for a similar situation when I was 17 ($500k for me, $500k for my father who owned the car). I was the equivalent of the dashcam driver in the situation and we won*, but more to the point, just because you’re in the right in an accident, doesn’t excuse stupid behavior. Moreover, just because you’ll win your insurance claim or court case, it’s best to avoid it altogether.
It shouldn’t take a $1m lawsuit for people to understand that it’s stupid to drive at high speeds next to cars stopped in traffic. 9 times out of 10, one of the drivers in the stopped traffic is going to try and get out of their lane and into your lane where, apparently, driving at high speed is a possibility.
Slow the -f- down. This dude was flying. It made me clench up just watching as he approached those cars.
If you’re on a highway and there’s a lane to the left, go there. Don’t drive 20, 30 or more mph next to stopped traffic or you will be smacking into a car that’s trying to escape.
Sure, that Honda Fit made a mistake, but it was entirely predictable. As I watched the video the first time, I knew exactly where the dashcam driver was about to go wrong. And I’m no Nostradamus. Dashcam guy should have been creeping as he approached the stopped drivers. But he was blasting down the road like he was on the Autobahn.
Moreover, an experienced driver knows that the left turn arrow will be short AF. The way Mr. Dashcam was driving, it seemed that he knew that as well. Indeed, at 1:39, you can see the car in front of him was just making the turn when the light turned yellow. So the only way he had a chance was to drive like a bat out of hell to get on the first driver’s ass.
He obviously didn’t make it, but the effort was clearly evident by his driving.
If I were Honda Fit’s attorney, I’d make a similar (but vastly longer) argument to show that the dashcam driver was also negligent. (this is not legal advice)
*In my case, I ended up rear-ending a car that was in my lane but obscured.