Originally published at: Grammy winner Pras Michel's lawyer used AI to draft his closing argument. It was garbage and Michel was convicted. | Boing Boing
…
It looks like Kenner’s closing argument isn’t the only thing artificial about him.
At least the Fugees are getting back together
That sounds like he might be able to appeal based upon insufficient counsel.
And can certainly sue his ex attorney.
Pretty much came here to say that his teeth look AI-generated - perhaps not in the “there are far too many of them” sense, but definitely in the “this looks weirdly and uncannily fake” sense.
That first one is a high bar. You have to show that it’s likely you would have prevailed but for the ineffective counsel. If your case was weak to begin with, that’s all but impossible.
The second one, though, that’s doable.
Oh! From the thumbnail it looked like he’d been embalmed…
Worst Bill Clinton/George Bush jr impressionist ever.
He looks like someone should try turning him off and then on again.
Unfortunately you usually can’t appeal a conviction if you actually paid for the lawyer and there wasn’t any kind of chicanery with the evidence.
But you can sue them for malpractice.
If there was a drinking game of “x uses AI to generate Y and gets caught”, we’d never survive a day.
WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO HIS TEETH??
Please tell me he just had his portrait taken and forgot to take out his dental guard?
He got Rob Liefeld character teeth.
Either veneers or dentures?
At least as far back as the 1990s some portrait studios have offered “dental correction” as an optional retouching service for people who are self-conscious about braces or crooked/discolored/missing teeth. The results are not always great.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.