Heather Cox Richardson

Thanks for that, she’s good when interviewed.

Speaking of the corporate media, here’s a good thread, reposted on FBook by Rebecca Solnit:

One more from (mostly) climate journalist David Roberts:

I haven’t written much about politics since the debate, mainly because I’m so overwhelmed by disgust & contempt toward this country’s media & commentariat that it has rendered me inarticulate with rage. Twitter probably doesn’t need more rage. I do just wanna make one point tho.

To be clear up front: I don’t give one tiny hot fuck who the Dem nominee is. I truly don’t. Biden’s fine. Harris is fine. A warm puddle of vomit is fine. There is no conceivable resolution to the nomination fight that could change the basic calculus of this race.

Preventing a fascist takeover of the US is my top priority–as a journalist, as a voter, as a human. If it isn’t yours too, you should feel bad about yourself. If you haven’t made the stakes of this election clear to everyone within the sound of your voice, you should feel bad.

But I’m not gonna rant. [breathes deeply] Just gonna make my one point, which is this: the idea that that the process of jettisoning Biden & choosing someone else will go well – will be allowed to go well – is a deeply deranged fantasy.

The idea that Dems will do this & will end up feeling unified, that Harris will come out popular, that “the dynamics of the race will shift,” all of that … fucking deranged. Deranged in such a perfectly characteristic Dem way.

“This person/policy/slogan/approach has been irredeemably slimed by Republicans & a hostile media – let’s throw it overboard!” That’s the Dem way. Always with this starry-eyed hope that they can reset, start over, get it right this time.

Just as one example – other people have aggregated these – there have been “calls” for every Dem nominee of the last 30 years to step aside. Dems practically delight in abandoning their own people, policies, & principles in response to bad-faith pressure. They f’ing love it.

But, as I’ve been saying for, oh, 20 years now, the situation is structural. The current situation is an outcome of a particular incentive structure & that structure will remain exactly the same if Harris takes over the ticket.

For centrists, journalists, pundits, even Dem electeds, the way you prove you are a Reasonable, Serious Person in DC is by shitting on Dems. For the left, the way you prove you are a true radical is by shitting on Dems. For the right … well, obviously.

Everyone’s professional incentives are to shit on Dems. Dwelling on Trump & his fascist movement – however justified by the objective facts – just doesn’t bring that juice, doesn’t get the clicks & the high-fives, doesn’t feel brave & iconoclastic. It’s just … no fun.

So, say Biden stepped aside in favor of Harris tomorrow. How long until the vapid gossips we call political reporters find something wrong with her, some alleged flaw they just have to write 192 stories about? How long until the hopped-up mediocrities we call pundits find some “counter-intuitive” reason that the new Dem ticket is flawed after all? How long until the irredentist left gets over the temporary thrill of its new Harris memes & remembers that she’s a cop & turns on her?

How long before the ambient racism & misogyny in the US lead center-leftists to conclude that, sure, they’d support a black woman, just not this black woman? In other words: how long before everyone reverts to their comfortable, familiar identity & narratives?

About 30 f’ing seconds, is my guess.

Dems uniting, feeling good, telling a clear story, receiving credit for their accomplishments–all of that is impossible in the current environment. It won’t be allowed. Dems can punch themselves in the face all they want, abandon whoever they want, apologize all they want…

… they simply will not be allowed to turn the page & start fresh, because everyone’s incentives remain the same. If they did that, elites, including media elites, would have no choice but to openly & frankly grapple with Trump & what he represents & they don’t want to.

Everyone feels comfortable shitting on Dems – it’s just a cozy professional space. You get to feel brave & independent (just like all the replacement-level pundits around you) with zero risk.

Yes, it’s abysmal, contemptible cowardice on a genuinely embarrassing scale, but it is what it is & we should have no illusions that it will change with a change in the top of the ticket.

As @whstancil has been trying to tell you people (good god how he tries), the information environment is thoroughly corrupted.
@whstancil For some reason, left pundits are pathologically averse to acknowledging that fact. And so they grasp at these straws – if we could just get rid of Biden, we could have a reasonable conversation! Yeah, sure. You absurd summer children.

@whstancil: This election is not a choice between two individuals, it’s a choice between worldviews, between futures. Do we want to continue down the path to multiethnic democracy or do we want to impose a white patriarchal Christian autocracy?

@whstancil: At stake is the entire federal civil service. The machinery of state built since WWII. Freedom & dignity for millions. Yes, democracy itself. That’s not an exaggeration. Yet this country’s elites have utterly failed to convey those stakes to the populace. A grotesque failure.

You can not look at this extraordinary media freakout this last week and not psychologize, not see all kinds of displacement. They can’t or won’t be serious about Trump & so they are fucking giddy at having permission to scold Dems again. Their safe place.

Anyway, my point is just: none of this will change if Harris replaces Biden at the top of the ticket. The idea that the media – with these soulless careerist court gossips in charge – will allow it is just fantasy. They need Dems in disarray & so they will engineer it.

The US is right on the precipice of falling into bona fide fascism & the vast majority of the voting public doesn’t even know it. That speaks to a deeply diseased information environment. Until Dems do something about that, all their self-flagellation will buy them nothing.

Not knowing what else to do, Dems shit on their own.

13 Likes

Kate Winslet GIF
:face_with_symbols_over_mouth:

10 Likes

The good news, the silver lining, if you will, is Biden already overcame all that crap in 2020, and can do so again. It looks like he’s standing his ground, and when Uncle Joe does that, he looks strong. He just needs to continue doing so, and T****’s own penchant for tripping over himself and picking unnecessary fights with allies will help.

8 Likes

July 5, 2024 (Friday)

For all that certain members of the media continue their freakout over Biden’s electability after his appearance in last Thursday’s event on CNN, it is Trump and his Republicans who appear to be nervous about the upcoming election.

Journalist Jennifer Schulze of Heartland Signal noted today that as of 8:00 this morning, the New York Times had published 192 pieces on Biden’s debate performance: 142 news articles and 50 opinion pieces. Trump was covered in 92 stories, about half of which were about the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling. Although Trump has frequently slurred his words or trailed off while speaking and repeatedly fell asleep at his own criminal trial, none of the pieces mentioned Trump’s mental fitness.

But for all of what independent journalists are calling a “feeding frenzy,” egged on by right-wing media figures, it seems as if the true implications of Project 2025 are starting to gain traction and the Trump campaign recognizes that the policies that document advocates are hugely unpopular.

On July 2, Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts assured Trump ally Steve Bannon’s followers that they are winning in what he called “the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.” In March, Roberts told former Trump administration official and now right-wing media figure Sebastian Gorka about Project 2025: “There are parts of the plan that we will not share with the Left: the executive orders, the rules and regulations. Just like a good football team we don’t want to tip off our playbook to the Left.”

This morning, although Roberts has described Project 2025 as “institutionalizing Trumpism,” Trump’s social media feed tried to distance the former president from Project 2025. “I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it,” the post read. Despite this disavowal of any knowledge of the project, it continued: “I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”

In what appeared to be a coordinated statement, the directors of Project 2025 wrote on social media less than two hours later that they “do not speak for any candidate.”

Aside from the fact that “[a]nything they do, I wish them luck,” sounds much like the signaling Trump did to the Proud Boys when he told them to “stand back and stand by,” Trump’s assertion and Project 2025’s response can’t possibly erase the many and deep ties of the Trump camp to Project 2025. Juliet Jeske of Decoding Fox News noted that Trump’s name shows up on more than 190 pages of the Project 2025 playbook.

Rebekah Mercer, who sits on the board of the Heritage Foundation, was one of Trump’s top donors in 2016; her family founded and operated Cambridge Analytica, the company that misused the data of millions of Facebook users to push pro-Trump and anti-Clinton material in 2016. Trump’s national press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, has appeared in a Project 2025 video. Trump’s own super PAC has been running ads promoting Project 2025, calling it “Trump’s Project 2025,” and many of its policies—killing the Department of Education, erasing the separation of church and state, ending renewable energy programs and ramping up use of fossil fuels, deporting immigrants—are also Trump’s.

Project 2025’s director, Paul Dans, as well as both of its associate directors, Spencer Chretien and Troup Hemenway, were in charge of personnel in Trump’s White House, and the theme of Project 2025 is that “people are policy,” by which they mean that hand-picked loyalists must replace civil servants. Trump’s former body man John McEntee, who reentered the White House as a senior advisor after having to leave because he failed a background check, was in charge of hiring in the last months of the Trump White House; he helped to draft Project 2025. Key Trump ally Russell Vought wrote the section of Project 2025 that called for an authoritarian leader; he is also on the platform committee of the Republican National Convention.

If indeed Trump knows nothing about Project 2025 and has no idea who is behind it, his cognitive ability is rotten. As former chair of the Republican National Committee Michael Steele wrote, “Since [Project 2025] is designed to institutionalize Trumpism and you know nothing about it, then why do you echo some of its policy priorities during your rallies? Coincidence? And how exactly don’t you know that Project 2025 Director Paul Dans served as your chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management, and Associate Director Spencer Chretien served as your special assistant and associate director of presidential personnel? And folks say we should be worried about Biden.”

Trump’s attempt to distance himself from Project 2025 indicates just how toxic that plan is with voters. As political scientist Ian Bremmer dryly noted, it seems that “the second [A]merican revolution apparently [is] not polling as well as the first in internal focus groups.” Former Republican strategist Rick Wilson was even more direct, saying that Trump was trying to distance himself from Project 2025 because “most of it polls about like Ebola,” the deadly virus that causes severe bleeding and organ failure, and has a mortality rate of 80 to 90%.

The extremism of the MAGA Republicans was on display in another way today as well after The New Republic published a June 30 video of North Carolina lieutenant governor Mark Robinson, currently the Republican nominee for governor of North Carolina, saying to a church audience about their opponents—whom he identified in a scattershot speech as anything from communists to “wicked people” to those standing against “conservatives”—"Kill them! Some liberal somewhere is gonna say that sounds awful. Too bad!.. Some folks need killing! It’s time for somebody to say it.”

Today the Vatican turned against one of those extremists when it excommunicated pro-Trump archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, who was the Vatican’s diplomat to the U.S. from 2011 to 2016, for “schism” after he refused to recognize the authority of Pope Francis. Viganò has repeatedly attacked Francis’s Catholic Church for being “inclusive, immigrationist, eco-sustainable, and gay-friendly.”

Also today, Trump’s lawyers asked Judge Aileen Cannon, who is overseeing Trump’s criminal trial for retaining hundreds of classified documents, to dismiss charges that can no longer be prosecuted in light of the Supreme Court’s decision that a president cannot be charged for crimes committed while engaging in “official acts.” They also called the case “politically motivated” and asked Cannon to stop the case entirely in light of Justice Clarence Thomas’s suggestion that Special Counsel Jack Smith was not properly appointed.

The other big news today was that the U.S. added 206,000 jobs in June, bringing the total number of jobs created under this administration to 15.7 million. Last month’s numbers were, once again, higher than economists expected and, according to economic analyst Steven Rattner, above job growth levels before the pandemic. He added that these jobs are not simply a bounceback from the depths of the pandemic: 6.2 million more Americans are employed now than before Covid hit.

Poking fun at the calls for Biden to step down, conservative lawyer George Conway posted: “Biden needs to RESIGN NOW before any more of these terrible job things are created.”

In a speech today in Madison, Wisconsin, Biden vowed to stay in the race, and the speech appeared strong enough that right-wing extremists, including Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and activist Laura Loomer, posted on social media—falsely—that he was having a medical emergency aboard Air Force One. Tonight, George Stephanopoulos of ABC interviewed Biden without a teleprompter or notes, focusing only on Biden’s age without any questions about policy. ABC News posted the interview transcript with the president’s conversation portrayed with the "g"s dropped off the words and with other colloquial pronunciations spelled out, as if it were dialect. Trump, whose words the press tends to turn into clean prose, has refused to do an interview under the same conditions.

13 Likes

What gives me hope is that Trump, other right wingers, much of mainstream media, corporate America, and many centrist establishment Democrats (which also describes Biden, ironically) seem absolutely terrified of a second Biden term. Julian Castro was on MSNBC yesterday basically saying that Biden was in complete denial of his own decline and really needed to step down. It was so ridiculous I had to turn it off. You’ve got Trump over there talking about sharks, electric boats, and electric planes, but Biden’s cognitive ability is the concern?

12 Likes

Also, Biden is not a convicted felon… or a fascist bent on ending American democracy…Seems like the media should be focused on that a bit more.

14 Likes

206,000 jobs added in June…3.9% wage growth over 3.1% inflation. Competence is boring. The one economic indicator they could point in the midst of the best economic growth in almost a century - but more evenly distributed than in the post-WWII period - is no longer a problem.

The media needs a horse race, and they’ll poison Secretariat to make one. They’ll burn down the grandstand to make it exciting.

Please, please please. If someone brings up inflation, ask them what the current inflation rate is. THEY DON’T KNOW. It’s just a boogeyman they’ve been told to repeat by Fox News.

8 Likes

NPR should LEAN into boring…

The Office Yes GIF

6 Likes

I can’t remember now where I saw this (in some thread connected with all of this and HCR, but I don’t think it was HCR herself), but the comment that said that the idea that Biden could step down now without throwing the Democratic Party into complete and utter chaos being nonsense is spot on. Like…seriously, how can anyone think that wouldn’t result in a political street brawl of 5 to 20 Democrats vying for the nomination? Nothing in the Democratic Party’s history suggests that everyone would unanimously and instantly rally around Kamala Harris as the nominee. Some would. Others would push Gavin Newsom. Progressives and other leftists would probably try to draft Sanders, Warren, or maybe even someone like Katie Porter. Centrist Democrats on Reddit seems to be in love with Buttigieg. And then there will be the inevitable parade of people with no chance, like Marianne Williamson and Dear Abby’s grandson whose name I can’t ever remember who join in. It would get ugly and dirty really fast, and whoever wins would not come out of it unscathed. And there would inevitably be a lot of voters turned off by the whole affair who just say fuck it and stay home in November.

Biden is it. He’s the guy. He’s not perfect. But he’s also not bad. And if he still wins and then has to step down in a year or two because he is unable to do the job anymore, the upside is we get our first woman President.

10 Likes

I can’t not see that as “30-50 feral Democrats…”

8 Likes

HCR said it in the video @anon61221983 posted.

I was coming in here to comment on that point. Helpful insight with some historical backing.

5 Likes

nbc brooklyn 99 GIF by Brooklyn Nine-Nine

6 Likes

When you’re done with him, may we borrow him?
(Asking for a UK friend).

I personally think he’s done a pretty bang-up job so far, but then I’m not a US resident, just a keen observer.

8 Likes

I think he’s done a really good job. If it weren’t for his policies towards Israel and Gaza, I would argue he’s been the best President since FDR. Even with that, his administration has clearly been the most progressive since LBJ, and maybe since FDR. Granted, that’s a really low bar. If someone decided that Biden’s support of Israel in that conflict makes it impossible for them to vote for Biden, I would disagree with that decision but I would understand it and respect it. It’s a defensible position, although I would point out that Trump would almost certainly make that conflict worse for Palestine. Still, it’s true that Israel is engaging in genocide and the US is enabling that genocide, so I’m not going to tell someone they can’t refuse to vote for Biden for that reason. It’s a morally and ethically defensible position. People refusing to support Biden because of his age, or because of inflation, or because they think he’s cognitively impaired…those reasons I will not respect because I do not find them to be defensible. I am not saying there’s no inflation or that it’s not a problem, but that Biden is not much responsible for it, if at all.

11 Likes

:thinking:

Lyndon B Johnson GIF by GIPHY News

But otherwise, I agree with you about Biden.

As for Israel, everyone since Carter has failed… Clinton came the closest with Oslo, but that’s turned out to be a disaster, because bad faith actors in Israel didn’t want to fix the situation (Bibi, mainly, but the Israel far right, too).

And of course Johnson’s big problem was Vietnam… Makes me think about the argument being made by Naomi Klein, that the maintenance of empire abroad will eventually boomerang back home (that fascism is merely imperialism turned in on the imperial center). That seems to be happening here right now in the US…

9 Likes

I did say if it weren’t for Israel and Gaza, he’d be the best since FDR. As it is, I agree LBJ was better. LBJ has Vietnam, though, so he’s not without some pretty big flaws. LBJ also came on the heels of FDR, Truman, Eisenhower (not a progressive, but a legitimately moderate Republican), and Kennedy. Biden is trying to turn the ship around from 40+ years of neoliberal policies and supply side economics bullshit, even under Democratic administrations. So I could argue Biden’s successfully moving the needle to the left a little is more impressive than LBJ’s continuation of progress begun under FDR.

God, how I wish these were the kinds of debates and discussions we were having in politics today, rather than “Fascism or not? Hmm, it’s a tossup?”

7 Likes

I’d have to send them this link:

10 Likes

Answer GIF
Ok, I retract my statement. There is no defensible reason to not vote for Biden.

7 Likes

Agreed that that is a big disadvantage, but LBJ was trying to steer through some difficult headwinds with integration. Kennedy had the youthful energy, but I’m not sure anyone was better with getting congress to heel than Johnson. Kennedy certainly had the charisma, but Johnson had the experience. I think if Kennedy had lived, he would have had a harder time pushing those key civil rights bills… I have no idea if Kennedy would have leaned on Johnson to do the dirty work to get it done. I think him being from the north would have made it harder too. Johnson intimately understood the problem of segregation because he was from the south and was from much humbler beginnings than Kennedy. I’d argue that Johnson had to deal with more problematic internal dissent from the southern wing of the party who were loath to end segregation… difficulties of different kind, I’d say, but not unsimilar to Biden’s trying to roll back 40 years of neoliberalism.

seth meyers GIF by Late Night with Seth Meyers

8 Likes

Or maybe we can have some sympathy for not loving the president who formally declared international law not to apply to ethnic cleansing by his friends, huh? While I agree that everyone should vote for Biden, simply because one genocide versus five is an easy trolley problem, it’s still horrible and the idea of telling a Palestinian American they need to suck it up and just accept their people having no right to life makes me feel like throwing up.

8 Likes