How an infuriated mom chased revenge-porn slime-king Hunter Moore offline

That being BoingBoing, you may think that they have a consistent opinion on things, but the attitude to similar events can actually vary even for the same author.

So where is your 10" stack of evidence to back up your speculation? Sure, some of the “revenge” pics are real, but Charlotte has real, solid evidence that many are not.

1 Like

But you’d be glad to blame anyone who’s had their private nudes put online. Don’t be such a coward, say what you obviously mean.

1 Like

There are entire horrible forums devoted to “hacking” tumblr/flickr/whatever imagehosts to find private nudes, so while not always the case, certainly plausible. Does it matter what percentage of persons are frightened and fibbed? They’re just trying to get the sites shut down, not arrest “hackers” that don’t exist or are their ex/bf. Fuck all these sites, the hack-based and the revenge-oriented.

2 Likes

I think maybe because the people who run BB are human? but I don’t see how this article is generally inconsistent with other articles they’ve posted?

True, works for other sites too. And by “similar” I meant “similar to each other”, not “similar to this one”. Everyone knows about Cory’s love/hate relationship with Disney, for example.

Oh, I absolutely agree. I can understand if there’s a point of legality for the purposes of a criminal or civil suit that requires a differentiation between photos that come from hacking/photoshopping vs photos that come from a former partner’s computer, but my guess is that it’s more of a social need to underline the difference so that the victims appear to be more…victimized.

Which, if you think about it, just underscores some nasty truths about our culture: if the photos came from a former partner, who had the pics because they were willingly given by the subject in the past, then “she was asking for it.”

I, like you, say Bullshit. No matter where the photos came from, they were meant to be private, and sharing them publicly is a violation of the subject’s privacy, trust, and dignity. It’s a victimization.

This doesn’t just apply to nudes, or to females. There are a number of sites where jilted exes share private sexual and personally identifying information (jobs, addresses, car make/model) about their former partners. In the heat of the moment, it doesn’t seem like revenge or victimization, but “warning” other people. But there’s at least 2 sides to every story, and now one of those sides is an upset ex who’s willing to spread personal information that could affect the lives and families of the target, all because someone thinks that anger, or being “right”, suddenly gives them The Right To Do It.

Even the information in a more private, opt-in forum can be purchased or acquired by a public site. As a bonus, those sites are often partnered, or owned by, information-removal businesses, to which the victim must pay hundreds of dollars to get their information guaranteed to be removed for a temporary period of time.

I’d like to live in a world where not only did it not matter where the information and nude photos came from, but also that when revenge porn/information is published, that people would simply pay it no mind.

1 Like

I guess my point was that he’s human, so he gets to be inconsistent. We’re all inconsistent. That’s called being human. In regards to your example, I think he can enjoy the art and culture disney produces, yet still acknowledge that they are a large corporation that acts in problematic ways.

But I really don’t see how this article, and the title of it, is inconsistent with other BB articles.

This could be the coffee talking, but I imagine one day, there’ll be an online campaign where hundreds of thousands of people, especially women, will post a nude photo of themselves online and dare their employers to fire or censure them.

I’m just trying to think of the best hashtag for this…

1 Like

Definitely, age and experience makes a difference. Heck, even just 3 years ago, I probably would have died of shame. Now, I like to think I’d be more like, longish coffee sip “Yep. Them’s ma bewbs. Can I go back to my desk now?”

1 Like

Speaking for myself, no you didn’t. But don’t let that get in the way of your tirade.

I think she’s saying that it is not just a shrill minority of prudes that slut shames women–it’s the culture in general. For that she’s largely correct. We’re ice queens or prudes if we don’t put out or dress “provocatively”, we’re sluts if we do put out or dress “provocatively”. We’re damned if we do, and damned if we don’t. it is not a group of hand wringing church ladies that are keeping us from some sort of egalitarian orgiastic paradise. It’s the very real sexism of the culture that is pervasive.

Example: Do you remember last year, a young girl was gang raped, then she was slut shamed by the NYT! She was 11 and the NYT seemed more concerned with the men who raped her - pay attention to the language this article points out-- “drawn in”. This 11 year old somehow drove these men to the point where they could not control themselves, it seems to imply:

11 Likes

I think American prudishness may also be more of a generational thing. Kids these days share nude selfies and seem unlikely to perpetuate the whole “Scarlet-A” stigma going forward. (And we’ll be well rid of it).

If you’re so good at mindreading, how did you end up in a relationship with a stalking tweaker?

1 Like

Except that young teenaged girls who participate in such often become the victims of cyber-bullying, often to the point of suicide:

So, not so much, actually.

9 Likes

It’s the same ‘kids’ who bully and slut-shame each other to suicide when they spread the nudie pics around though. Also the same generation who spread videos of their buddies raping passed-out drunk girls.

I don’t think it’s just prudishness. It’s really just good old cruelty, for no real reason.

6 Likes

(I’m not disagreeing with anything you’ve said, but my desire to participate substantively in this particular discussion was voided by Miss “I can read your mind” YellingPants. Hope to engage in another thread.)

2 Likes

If $100 will purchase thousands of Facebook logins on the black market, it is easy to imagine a motivated revenge-porn site owner spending the money and time to access and troll through hundreds of Facebook accounts per day, mining for revenge-porn gold. Then, when he has exhausted the rich veins of real images, he might spend his afternoons productively honing his photoshop skills on any Facebook debutantes who seem most likely to have generous allowances or daddies willing to pay his commission. No, when revenge porn is a profitable commodity, it becomes easy to imagine a “large slice” of it being stolen or created to benefit those whose livelihood depends on it.

5 Likes

Ooh, excellent point. Thank you.

Just to play devil’s advocate, though, this assumes the victim is thinking rationally about the situation. I can imagine the perception being that someone would be looked down on for the naked/sex pics, but perception being that they’d be subjected to more ridicule if they’d given pics over willingly. Or with teens, “Mom and dad will get really mad if they think I did it on purpose.” Not everybody who lies thinks it through.

But you are right; it’s worse when someone is outed as a liar, even if they lied out of panic and/or shame.

As she pointed out, she was victimized, and it seems you are dismissing her points on that by saying it’s a few loud assholes, not a systemic problem with our culture. if that is not true, you should explain what you actually meant.

4 Likes