In Paris, they have modified most of the bridges over the Seine so locks cannot be attached anymore (Pont des Arts was the most famous spot for them, and now has plexiglass sides). Nevertheless, determined tourists manage to find anything within spitting distance of the river – and sometimes far from it – to attach their stupid locks. At a certain point, tour guides pushed it as a centuries-old tradition, but as I recall it is thought to have originated somewhere touristy in eastern Europe about 20 years ago (don’t quote me on that).
In Paris, it reached the point where the city claimed the weight of the locks posed a safety problem for the bridges, and the keys discarded into the river created a pollution problem for the river. Given how many humans the Pont des Arts can support, the safety factors that go into bridge designs (I’m an engineer, though not a civil one), and how polluted the river was at the time of the ban (it is still polluted, but less so, and they hope to have Olympic events in it next year), I don’t know how accurate those claims are, but from an aesthetic point of view I am happy the locks are mostly gone. Though as an uncivil engineer, I’m used to people dismissing my point of view on aesthetics.
Oh, yes. The footpaths are often narrow and steep, according to a former Sunday School teacher of mine who visited, but may or may not have been exaggerating.
The takeaway, performative “love” is littering, uncivilized, wasteful and environmentally destructive. Who care about how you show your “love” to the world if you will just break up few months later after your Instagram spectacle.
All this padlock, scribbling to historical sites…all the stupid tourist couples can think up on the spur of the moment need to go away. At some point, the local may need to require visitors to be single only.
Maybe there should be signs saying every time a park ranger has to bolt cutter a lock, the corresponding relationship is summarily severed. Or every time a condor ingests a key, a relative dies. Just use the superstition against them.