First they have to take away all the guns, then they can DO THIS.
howâs a treaty requiring handing over privacy records going to fly given CJEU?
No, they havenât.
This is just one battle within an on-going class war.
Weâre still very much fighting with the ever-growing and most massive, dynamic grassroots movement weâve ever seen in the history of our nation against these piles of corporatist shit.
Isnât this very much a double-edged sword? Signatories could stop trials involving malfeasance by their own corporations, but a do-gooder country could put a stop to trials of, say, persecuted whistleblowers and fall guys.
Really? How is this clickbait? Iâm really interested in what youâre saying.
Shadowrun?
They want to give us George Orwell.
If weâll work hard enough, we can turn it into William Gibson.
you'll notice that all of the provisions that recognize the rights of the public are non-binding, whereas almost everything that benefits rightsholders is bindingThe part of EFF's analysis I "liked" best.
what if we just shot all the execs of media and telecom companies? and then just keep going until no one wants to wave that flag any more.
Yeah, well, Neuromancer is hardly a cheerful milieu Plus, no-one invented cellphones there
.
âBâ Ark taken to its logical conclusion.
But donât forget to let the telephone sanitisers stay.
Everybody has their own cellphone these days. Are said sanitizers still necessary?
Understandable. Tempting even. But when talking potential mass extinction youâd really really have to have it in for 'em.
Of course they donât. The only way the gun people will get involved is if they threaten that right itself. Otherwise, theyâll happily sit it out just like every other civil rights violation theyâve ignored.
What @tomxvesely said. We donât
You forgot to include âwake up sheepleâ in your rant.
At this point, I assume Cory made this up as clickbait.
I donât recall being asked
Deference to authority