People forget quickly and are prone to miss missing things.
Iâd suggest placing a sign âA sign used to be hereâ behind the âWatch for this signâ one, as a subtle reminder.
Clearly the librarians are in cahoots with al-Qaeda. And donât they get those sweet public pensions? Line them up together with the schoolteachers!
Better: ProXPN - They offer free, slower Basic Accounts or high-speed, paid Premium Accounts. And theyâre NOT located in the USA. For more complete anonymity, they also take BitCoin.
They advertise on various podcasts I listen to. Security Now!'s Steve Gibson has vetted them. Discount codes are usually featured on the ads.
And as to yearbooks, all that means is the FBI has to go get them off the shelves themselves, just like anyone else. All the warrant does is let them keep them almost forever.
I imagine that the school library is only for use by students and faculty. Even then I would guess yearbooks are probably only able to used on premises, not checked out. I would imagine the three letter agency in question wanted to âborrowâ and digitize them for use with facial recognition software or the likeâŚ
Thanks. Iâll look into your claims. At first glance, however:
âRank 1stâ? You DID read that TorrentFreak article you provided the link to, no? Quoting from the article: The order of the lists holds no value. Itâs just a list, Scott, not a ranking. (ScottJean? Jean?) Besides, youâre going to copyânâpast the selling points, ProXPNâs streaming cypher uses 512 bits. So there.
The TorrentFreak article also listed proxy.sh as a no-log VPN provider. Hereâs a link to the scathing Ars Technica article on them and their âtransparencyâ reports.
While PIA may not/does not log all network transactions, they ARE subject to American laws. If PIA had received a secret warrant/letter from the FBI, they wouldnât be allowed to tell anyone.
Europe has strong privacy laws. Naw, scratch that: At least Europe, in contrast to the US, HAS people-protecting privacy laws - my guess that this is the benefit of having borne the brunt of the effects of the Third Reich and the Soviet Union. In contrast, the USA has strong corporation-protecting privacy laws (plus a ton of other corporation-protecting laws). You can pick which one you think is better.
Five minutes of googling led me to a reddit discussion about why, as of four months ago, PIA didnât have a warrant canary. For other readers, hereâs a link to Ars Technicaâs article on PIA - Farivar is neither enthusiastic nor disappointed. He recognizes that heâs essentially at the mercy of the companyâs claims. Caveat Emptor.
ProXPN is insecure than PIA VPN it is a world know fact regardless
Everyone can ask the question if ProXPN is better here Reddit VPN and find the answer themselves.
About TorrentFreak, ProXPN has never been on TorrentFreak and that list is the TOP vpn rating list in the world.
Europe and U.S are the same and work very closely with NSA, the snowden documents have proven it. So to say ProXPN is better because it is based in Europe is really short sighted.
Also, PIA VPN runs a âno-logâ vpn service, which means, even if NSA were to ask for data, PIA cannot provide it since they donât log anything.
ProXPN logs your ip address and if NSA or Europe were to ask ProXPN for logs, they have data to handover.
PIA VPN is better than ProXPN in all the aspects from speed to security and pricing.
A Billing Scam by proXPN?
httpx://iconnectdots.com/2013/08/a-billing-scam-by-proxpn.html
Er, no?
One bird does not make a flock.
Isnât one bird a lower limit of a flock?
Assuming we wonât do math-style tricks with empty flocks?
Iâd hazard a guess that two birds would be the absolute lower limit of a flock. Are you thinking of a set of birds?
A bird would be âaâ bird. And a word. Havenât you heard?
Two crows is called attempted murder.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
