Medieval paintings of animals that look nothing like real animals because the artist had never seen them

Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2020/10/09/medieval-paintings-of-animals-that-look-nothing-like-real-animals-because-the-artist-had-never-seen-them.html

6 Likes

Medieval artists did a lot of fanciful drawings. The pornography in marginalia, the monks with trumpets in their butts, giants fighting snails, etc etc. I always wondered whether these representations were “best guess based on hearsay” drawings or “I don’t care and am going to do something fun that could be correct.” They seemed to be having a lot of fun with it, though.

14 Likes

Personally I’m a big fan of the elephants at Basel cathedral

23 Likes

Perfect.

1 Like

I gotta believe some of these are just artistic license… certainly there were snails in Medieval Belgium?

Or maybe it’s just some kind of ancient Pokémon?

25 Likes

I love the idea of ancient scribes trying to “catch ‘em all.”

11 Likes

Looks just like my little cocker spaniel… If he had a garden hose attached to his face.

6 Likes

That oyster looks pissed.

(I like the composition of the tiger and crocodile drawings. Nice balance.) :slightly_smiling_face:

3 Likes

Wasn’t the unicorn myth based on garbled descriptions of the rhinoceros?

8 Likes

Yeah, you see a heck of a lot of pumas that look like deformed dogs in old Andean art, and I always figured it’s because most people got a better look at dogs than pumas. I mean, even if you see one, you’re not going to stick around to sketch it!

6 Likes

Gotta sketch 'em all.

12 Likes

I can’t draw worth a damn, but I’d 100% buy a medieval Pokémon coloring book.

11 Likes

Maybe, but nobody ever wants a rhinoceros chaser, trust me.

20 Likes

Unicorn Rhino, Treadmill, Exercise

31 Likes

There was (is?) a theory (a bit stretched, in my opinion) out there about the artists responsible for the prehistoric cave paintings in France: They had eidetic memories, i.e., given the the artworks’ no-nonsense similarity to the real things.

That theory aside, what grabbed me was how the artists, by and large, did not decide to do fanciful renditions; an artistic choice driven by [insert another theory here].

5 Likes

Darwin was right.

2 Likes

There’s another theory that says if the men were all out hunting for food then it was the women who did the cave paintings.

'Course, it could be that it was the women who did the hunting and old Paelo Picasso just sat on his arse mucking about with animal fat and charcoal all day…

17 Likes

6 Likes

That pose. Looks like a Byzantine era rendition of God.

4 Likes

Now that you mention it, it is, uh…Justinian so.

4 Likes