The issue is that some young women are socially pressured to affect vocal fry when otherwise they might speak with their ânormalâ voice. So mostly itâs society thatâs telling you what to do, and Wolf is just trying to offer another option.
The goal is obviously for each women to talk how she likes to talk, but not to do so out of deference to stereotypes that a feminine voice is less cool or that women must adopt affectations in order to be taken seriously.
Why, sometimes Iâve had as many as six brain tumors before breakfast.
You can feel free to not agree with the norm. Doesnât mean it doesnât exist.
I am embarrassed to ask, but i have no sound. Is vocal fry like daria?
Yeah, I get the feeling that however women would be speaking, someone would be out there, ready to explain to them how theyâre doing it wrong. Just change yourself a few more times, and then weâll take you seriously. Promise.
How about if we try to deal with that need to constantly be telling women how to do things, instead?
Whether or not I agree is not the point. People often assert things as norms without any evidence, and they usually have a bias for or against it. It seems to be trivially easy for the average person to assume that they know what âeverybodyâ thinks, which I think should encourage skepticism.
Is it weird that I think vocal fry is kind of attractive? Everyone on the teevee machine keeps telling me its awful, but it has this sort of âno fucks were givenâ aplomb vibe to it in my mind that is kind of delightful.
But Iâm a weirdo. And also itâs not a ladyâs job to be attractive to me.
Iâm all for someone training their voice to sound more authoritative if thatâs what they wanna do. But I donât know why we decided that vocal fry is something to be abhorred.
I agree, it is so goddam annoying. In fact, if I had to choose, I would much prefer a return to valley-girl affectations than vocal fry.
Itâs not about âa ladyâs job to be attractiveâ itâs about not being an annoying human being.
Maybe I misread, because I do agree somewhat with what youâre saying here ⌠Isnât the assumption here that how one speaks is generally a straight up choice, rather than part of oneâs cultural and social upbringing - something you donât have total control over? But sheâs still asking women to change how they speak in order to be âless annoyingâ, which is what the problem seems to be. Some men find uptalk and vocal fry annoying⌠but thatâs their problem, Iâd argue. It seems sheâs asking young women to speak more professionally rather than be themselvesâŚ
Oh no someoneâs speaking with a crackle in their voice! Quick, call the whaaaaambulance.
Yeah, sign me up for the I Donât Get It newsletter. Perhaps rather than investigating vocal fry we should be investigating the folks whom it drives bananas?
I find misogyny annoying, but looks like we canât shake that, can we?
Okay, I wikipediaed it. Vocal fry is awesome. Just like anything I prefer things that people have range and whimsy, but donât disparage gravelly voices for anyone.
The woman in the video wasnât Naomi Wolf, she was the one who wrote the Guardian article.
Being annoying is gender neutral.
I think sheâs sort of like that⌠I donât know. This whole issue in the past few months came out of no where. Seems to me is more justifying of sexism⌠women donât move up because they have babies⌠women donât move up because they donât dress professionally⌠women donât move up because some men find their voices annoying⌠WTF?
Yet I donât see a whole new cottage industry telling men how theyâre speaking wrong. When a guy does something annoying, itâs an individual problem⌠when women do something annoying, itâs the whole gender thatâs the problem.
Fuck that noise. 70% of the time at home my wife does a Maria bamford/adventure time impression , and I do a combination of Nick offerman and a guy I used to work for.
If you ever see me type, âyou see, realisticallyâ I am making an inside joke 11 people know
Back to the point. Fuck those fucking fuckers.
So you are asserting that it isnât the norm without evidence because I suggested that it was without evidence.
It is anecdotally suggested in the article which I guess I was just using as an assumptions of the discussion. One that also seems to be assumed be most all the media I have consumed.
Itâs also discussed in regards to vocal fry within the This American Life Segment, âGlass talked to linguist Penny Eckert, who did a study asking people to rate how authoritative a radio reporter with vocal fry sounded. The response depended on the age of the rater. Those under 40 thought it sounded authoritative while those over 40 did not. Basically, as summed up by Glass, âif people are having a problem with these reporters on the radio, what it means is theyâre old.ââ