A hobby implies a group of like minded others. People may spend a great deal of money on their hobby to satisfy their own interests, friendship contacts, etc.
I know of no hobby where enthusiasts are employed by an extremely profitable enterprise (ie major sports team), and given an extremely binding contract that has rules about weight, grooming standards, deportment, pantyhose and suggested tampon use.
While you may not see the misogyny, this does not mean it is not an inherent aspect of this sports culture, or exploitative contract.
Certain athletes like football players are selected and groomed while at the highschool level. What becomes of the girls/young women who have excelled at things like dance, gymnastics and cheerleading ? Do they have promising scholarships or lucrative endorsement deals to look forward to when they graduate ? Most female gymnasts reach the peak of performance excellence far before the age of 18. The social construct of being a cheerleader for a national sports team is dangled like a carrot - marketed to the athletic girls/women who can fulfill a certain standard of beauty AND performance. This construct - with things like posters, personal appearances, etc. and proximity to the real performers (ie the âreal athletesâ) provide the illusion that this may lead to greater things - like success, being a celebrity, being "discovered"on the basis of their talent or star quality. The reality is that it is a complete rip-off. The women who spoke out were promptly fired.
Have you ever applied for a job where you were assessed on your suitability for the job while a panel of people graded you on your physical appearance ? While you did physically challenging manouvers in what was basically underwear ? And while this position had been culturally sold to you for your entire lifetime - there was no one to warn you how exploitative this was ? So that when the terms of your employment were sold to you - like you had won a BIG PRIZE that you had to take very careful care of - lest you be replaced for a minor infraction. It is an inherently abusive arrangement.
I know you would like to believe that this is not a product of misogyny - that all that stuff was gotten rid of in the 70âs. That these poor dumb gold-digging cheerleaders are just doing it to themselves. That there are so many other better opportunities for them.
Here, read this story, about the authorâs mother, who was a tenured professor of medicine, who discovered that her male colleagues with similar credentials and education were paid up to FIVE TIMES as much as she was - and when she fought back she was fired:
And as a dude, explain again to all the ladies how this is not just another instance of misogyny at work and play. Tell me again how there are just as many womenâs sports teams, where athletes are paid the same as the male superstars, who get the same amount of national airtime, endorsements, etc. Tell me again about all the opportunities those cheerleading women have to professionally pursue what they have been trained to do since girlhood.