7 Likes
With apologies to @nosaj, but this seems to apply here as well:
11 Likes
3 Likes
3 Likes
6 Likes
Orcas, sea lions. Whatâs next? Blue whales?
10 Likes
Fun. Frustrating.
1 Like
3 Likes
The video game biz is usually quite secretive about putting actual sales info out so a mess up this big is quite noteworthy
4 Likes
They used a marker to make redactions?! That is very amateur hour. Adobe pro doesnât cost that much and every law firm (or office of in-house counsel) should have it or something similar to make redactions.
8 Likes
12 Likes
Biden has disclosed he has sleep apnea for years now. Do they understand that the fact he is using a CPAP now actually makes him healthier than before?
12 Likes
Dark CPAPed Brandon strikes again!!!
9 Likes
6 Likes
Not sure what Adobe Pro does with the covered text these days. I recall an incident about 15 years ago in which PDF tools were used to redact text. They discovered, after the PDFs were released, that the âredactionâ process covered underlying text with a black box but retained the underlying text. If you interfered with the box-covering step (using non-Adobe tools), you could read the document clearly.
Since then, when I need to redact stuff, I use a screengrab and edit the image directly, erasing the info. Keeping track of holes in the tools is too much work, and I donât need to redact much.
1 Like
I think the case youâre thinking of they drew boxes over it rather than using the redaction tools. It may have been the case the redaction tools didnât exist yet, I donât know.
5 Likes
I suspect thatâs it; or the redactor didnât know about them.
Redaction isnât part of my daily, or even monthly, workflow, so Iâm absolutely not across the tech. Which is why I get by with a screengrab. 
2 Likes
Brie? Iâd have gone with a Morbier myself, but chacun Ă son goĂ»t.
2 Likes
