Indeed. I feel bodily autonomy should be considered a “natural” right. Not given to a person, but endowed by the creator, to borrow a phrase.
someone in Oklahoma please pass this along to dipshit Humphrey. When you can be a “host” then you can talk you stupid fucking asshole.
Yeah, got that. Even a tepid attempt at humor, maybe. But I chafe when someone “gives me the go-ahead” to do things which that person has zero authority to regulate in the first place.
So, fuck this guy…no wait, nobody ever fuck him again. That ought to shut his sorry ass up once and for all!
“I believe one of the breakdowns in our society is that we have excluded the woman out of all of these types of decisions,” [Humphrey] said. “I understand that they feel like that is their body,” he said of men. “I feel like it is a separate — what I call them is, is you’re a ‘donor.’ And you know when you enter into a relationship you’re going to be that donor and so, you know, if you pre-know that then take all precautions and don’t have sex,” he explained. “So that’s where I’m at. I’m like, hey, your body is your body and be responsible with it. But after you’re irresponsible then don’t claim, well, I can just go and do this with another body, when you’re the donor and you put that in.”
There. Fixed it.
At the point when an infant becomes involved in the statutory rape situation, it’s counterproductive to toss the predator in jail. Make the would-be-convicted-rapist work to support both the baby and the child.
He had dropped out of high school, so peers weren’t other students. Also, this was 1985 - and while statutory rape was on the books, the girl had to consent to press charges.
Hypocrisy is as unescapable as death and taxes. Blame the girl, and not the guy. Those who derided your friend might likely criticize Islamic practices while – although not in the name of Sharia law – seemingly embrace its tenets. People… just… don’t… think. Zero introspection.
It’s not hypocrisy if you don’t see women as people. /s
Your nicely-pointed sarcasm is so close to being commendation. Such ‘fine’ distinctions have made the indigestible downright appetizing to a certain ilk.
While i like the sentiment i have to point out that that sort of operation is much more dangerous for the woman than an abortion.
If you go back to my original comment, you’ll realize why your winky-face reply is a bit asinine.
Please explain why you think it’s “asinine”.
No.
Your response explains your misreading of the winky-face.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.