The refusal to organize across racial lines is currently supported by an establishment that includes black people, and instrumentalizes blackness to serve its own interests - I point to Ta-nehisi Coates as the clearest and most influential example. The insistence of understanding whites as members of a privileged nation first, as unworthy of trust, as difficult to educate, as hopelessly racist, is a construction that holds the racist moment in place, it is not a stepping stone on the path. A cross racial alliance against capital is obvious; it is just anathema to neoliberalism. I will assume you have already read Cornel West’s critique of this line of thinking; if not, here it is again.
The notion that a class analysis could substitute for a race analysis is an absurdity posed by a modern left that seems to have forgotten that the “intersectionality” it is fond of was originally meant to be a marriage between race, class and gender politics; class, conveniently, has dropped out. This is NOT an accident. The arguments you are making are the same one Coates makes in his recent book, the insistence that class politics are always a form of white fascism and can never serve black people. These are the politics that abhor Trump as an inhuman monster but celebrate Obama as some sort of Black messiah, while he for eight years ran the American empire.
This construction is meant to serve neoliberalism, to allow Blackness to be another totem in the pocket of the liberal establishment that can be waved around to cow both whites who wish to be anti-racist and lull blacks into thinking they have any hope in the neoliberal party, which, meanwhile, goes on vitiating the lives of both black and white Americans. Race politics make no sense without class politics; the entire point of racism is that it pushes blacks into an underclass. Ending racism IS a class struggle. Oprah and Barack Obama are not oppressed people merely because of their blackness, and their victories are not automatically victories for all Black people.
We’re about to see Coates’ politics writ large across the screen. While his vision of a Black king ruling a black nation is raking in billions of dollars on behalf of Disney, you might ask yourself how it is that an allegedly anti-racist politics can be so celebrated by a white establishment.
You’re right, much of labor history (going way back before the 70s) has included organizing along, rather than across, race lines. But it would be a shame to ignore the equally long history of labor activism by, and for, people of color. I, personally, do not think it would be a great shame if people of color were the leaders in doing this work and found ways to include whites in their movement. We can’t simultaneously castigate whites as hopeless racists who can’t even speak to black people without asserting their privilege and then expect them to build a pan-racial movement - how would that work? Whites forming organizations and inviting blacks to it after they have already established themselves as the authority is the definition of privileged organizing. We WANT black leadership in the class struggle; we should insist on it. Black leadership of the previous generation saw this as part of the struggle against racism; only our generation refuses to evince any class politics in our study of race.
In any case, the point is that both whites and blacks have to see themselves as part of a common struggle - against racism and imperialism, whiteness and the class system - in order for this alliance to be possible at all.
I pose you my question again: how should poor whites be organized, and by whom, to end racism? How do you actually dismantle white privilege? How can you attack this privilege without confronting the class system that makes up its bones?