Published by the best possible magazine to publish that particular article.
ETA: Meaning the synchronicity of the name and the topic. Belatedly realizing my comment might be misread as a slight on the magazine, which I didnât intend.
Whyâs that? Is it because its readers are Trumpâs aspirational social circle?
Oh, Vanity Fair publishes plenty of good articles and AFAIK has a wide readership. Iâm just amused how well the name of the magazine fits the topic of the article. I didnât occur to me until you mentioned it that it could seem like a dis on the magazine. Iâll update the comment.
I was taking it to mean Trump being humiliated in front of people heâd like to see as peers but whoâve been practicing social distancing on him since forever, so, cool. 
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes:
Indigenous community with an uninvited immigrant and disease problem? Thatâs not new.
Further, Howard-Browne insisted that his church was the cleanest building in Florida, if not the world, having put into use 13 machines, which he didnât identify, that supposedly kill viruses instantly.
Was it one of these?
Good grief, yeah thatâs horrible. In Alaskan villages the 1918 epidemic saw mortality rates at up to 50% in some cases, way beyond the outside averages. Some towns survived only by placing armed guards around the perimeters.
Goddamn these shitheels are deplorable.
Iâll wait until Narcissistâs Home Journal weighs in on the topic.
Itâs always a difficult decision to burn in hell for all eternity for the sake of a few dollars, but congratulations for the courage, I guess.
I donât get why theyâre even bothering to negotiate with this asshole. This is the kind of thing eminent domain was made for. Just repossess the building.
To block you from hearing all the bad news in your hometown from local people that youâre more likely to trust and that he canât single out as fake news.
I had the same thought. Ordinarily Iâm deeply suspicious the use of eminent domain because itâs almost always used to take property from the marginalized. But in this case Iâd be okay with it. Which is probably why it wonât happen, because the landlord would have the resources to fight it legally.
